<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capt. Sam Wright: Fixing the military voting mess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/capt-sam-wright-fixing-the-military-voting-mess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/capt-sam-wright-fixing-the-military-voting-mess/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rasmusen</title>
		<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/capt-sam-wright-fixing-the-military-voting-mess/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Rasmusen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/capt-sam-wright-fixing-the-military-voting-mess/#comment-757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As written, the statute is ambiguous about who has the right of action. It says that the AG does have that right, but not whether anybody else does or does not. Apparently the federal district court in Maryland has just said that a private party can enforce it.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As written, the statute is ambiguous about who has the right of action. It says that the AG does have that right, but not whether anybody else does or does not. Apparently the federal district court in Maryland has just said that a private party can enforce it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
