Comments on: Contradicting Supreme Court, DOJ rejects photo ID law due to lack of voter impersonation fraud and speculative burden http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/contradicting-supreme-court-doj-rejects-photo-id-law-due-to-lack-of-voter-impersonation-fraud-and-speculative-burden/ Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:18:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37 By: TXElectionlaw http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/contradicting-supreme-court-doj-rejects-photo-id-law-due-to-lack-of-voter-impersonation-fraud-and-speculative-burden/#comment-673 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:14:38 +0000 http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/contradicting-supreme-court-doj-rejects-photo-id-law-due-to-lack-of-voter-impersonation-fraud-and-speculative-burden/#comment-673 Abbott should withdraw the TX voter ID submission ASAP and take it to the DC District Court for a quick preclearance.

]]> By: TexasTea http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/contradicting-supreme-court-doj-rejects-photo-id-law-due-to-lack-of-voter-impersonation-fraud-and-speculative-burden/#comment-672 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 19:59:12 +0000 http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/contradicting-supreme-court-doj-rejects-photo-id-law-due-to-lack-of-voter-impersonation-fraud-and-speculative-burden/#comment-672 DOJ sets yet another impossible burden of proof on states. Impersonation fraud cannot be “proven” or quantified without the tool required to detect it: Voter ID. Prosecution is impossible because there is no evidence of the impersonator’s real identity, so all reports are brushed off as anecdotal.

]]>