Comments on: DOJ leaks they will object to Texas Redistricting plan

By: Kevin Beck

Kevin Beck — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:25:29 +0000

Is there anything the Department of Injustice will not get their grubby, partisan hands involved in?

By: Daniel from TN

Daniel from TN — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:03:28 +0000

This move is no surprise. Any plan that does not favor Democrats, or at least hurt Republicans, will be challenged by the Obama Dept. of Justice (The US Dept of Justice does not exist at this time).

By: Larry Pierson

Larry Pierson — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:54:23 +0000

What else should we expect from an administration that seeks to have federal control over every aspect of our lives? Obama's idea of 'federalism' is to turn the states, which surrendered only a limited amount of sovereignty over to the federal government when it was formed, to turn virtually all of their remaining sovereignty over to him.

On top of which, Obama utterly despises Texas. His BATF started a major wildfire earlier this year in a botched attempt to destroy some unwanted explosives. Obama has yet to compensate us for the damages done and the costs of putting the fire out.

By: Penny

Penny — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:36:21 +0000

The Dept. of InJustice needs to butt out and mind it’s own business or a better solution would be to through Holder out of office as he runs the most corrupt DOJ in history. Texas needs to secede from the Union and tell this Socialist Muslim regime to stick it!

By: rbblum

rbblum — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:21:27 +0000

The DOJ's voting rights enforcement reflects their perverse interpretations in regards to redistricting for the independent school district in Beaumont, TX.

EXAMPLE: Not only are Hispanics classified as caucasian but past trends of non-voting African-Americans are factored in as a positive bias for the African-American community.

IN SHORT: IMO, Not only does the DOJ actively pursue a policy of racial divisiveness in 'the south', the legal representative hired by the independent school district acts in the best interests of the school administration and board members . . . not the best interest of the students and taxpayers; and oftentimes in disregard to 'the law'.