<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times wants DOJ to burn the &#8220;Campaign Jungle&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/new-york-times-wants-doj-to-burn-the-campaign-jungle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/new-york-times-wants-doj-to-burn-the-campaign-jungle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasTea</title>
		<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/new-york-times-wants-doj-to-burn-the-campaign-jungle/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasTea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/new-york-times-wants-doj-to-burn-the-campaign-jungle/#comment-686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lefties are so simple, always projecting their own sins onto others, trying to deflect and distract.  Clearly it&#039;s Obama and the Democrats who have been recipients of donations that have become &quot;outright bribes&quot; - from Solyndra and other &quot;green&quot; companies run by big Obama bundlers, billionaire Dem-donor-owned smallpox drug manufacturer Siga, union pals at SEIU &amp; AFL-CIO, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DailyBeast even acknowledges &quot;The grant and guaranteed-loan recipients were early backers of Obama before he ran for president, people who continued to give to his campaigns and exclusively to the Democratic Party in the years leading up to 2008. Their political largesse is probably the best investment they ever made in alternative energy. It brought them returns many times over.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The call for &quot;criminal complaints&quot; signals there&#039;s undoubtedly justification for criminal complaints in the Dems donor dealings.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also seems to be part of a larger pattern of lefties casually tossing out &quot;reasonable&quot; suggestions to subvert the Rule of Law: Hey, let&#039;s throw people in jail who say stuff we don&#039;t like!  We outta bypass that rebellious Congress and just run the country without &#039;em!  Wouldn&#039;t it be convenient if we just skipped the next round of elections?  As if repeating this crazy stuff often enough will make it seem less crazy and more mainstream (like transgender Girl Scouts).  But who is there to enforce the Law when the top law enforcement official takes marching orders from the Lawbreaker in Chief?  It&#039;s a pickle.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lefties are so simple, always projecting their own sins onto others, trying to deflect and distract.  Clearly it&#8217;s Obama and the Democrats who have been recipients of donations that have become &#8220;outright bribes&#8221; &#8211; from Solyndra and other &#8220;green&#8221; companies run by big Obama bundlers, billionaire Dem-donor-owned smallpox drug manufacturer Siga, union pals at SEIU &#038; AFL-CIO, etc.</p>
<p>The DailyBeast even acknowledges &#8220;The grant and guaranteed-loan recipients were early backers of Obama before he ran for president, people who continued to give to his campaigns and exclusively to the Democratic Party in the years leading up to 2008. Their political largesse is probably the best investment they ever made in alternative energy. It brought them returns many times over.&#8221;</p>
<p>The call for &#8220;criminal complaints&#8221; signals there&#8217;s undoubtedly justification for criminal complaints in the Dems donor dealings.  </p>
<p>It also seems to be part of a larger pattern of lefties casually tossing out &#8220;reasonable&#8221; suggestions to subvert the Rule of Law: Hey, let&#8217;s throw people in jail who say stuff we don&#8217;t like!  We outta bypass that rebellious Congress and just run the country without &#8216;em!  Wouldn&#8217;t it be convenient if we just skipped the next round of elections?  As if repeating this crazy stuff often enough will make it seem less crazy and more mainstream (like transgender Girl Scouts).  But who is there to enforce the Law when the top law enforcement official takes marching orders from the Lawbreaker in Chief?  It&#8217;s a pickle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
