<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slate Magazine: Obama gamble on voter ID threatens Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/slate-magazine-obama-gamble-on-voter-id-threatens-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/slate-magazine-obama-gamble-on-voter-id-threatens-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasTea</title>
		<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/slate-magazine-obama-gamble-on-voter-id-threatens-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasTea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/slate-magazine-obama-gamble-on-voter-id-threatens-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act/#comment-667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Slate realize what a weak case DOJ presented in SC and is trying to lower lefty expectations?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In any case, let&#039;s hope Slate is correct that Section 5 itself will be struck down by SCOTUS.  This from Justice Roberts should give SC, TX and others encouragement - and an opening argument: “So is it … your position that today southerners are more likely to discriminate than northerners?”
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Slate realize what a weak case DOJ presented in SC and is trying to lower lefty expectations?</p>
<p>In any case, let&#8217;s hope Slate is correct that Section 5 itself will be struck down by SCOTUS.  This from Justice Roberts should give SC, TX and others encouragement &#8211; and an opening argument: “So is it … your position that today southerners are more likely to discriminate than northerners?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
