<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Wins Round in Fight Against Registration Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/texas-wins-round-in-fight-against-registration-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/texas-wins-round-in-fight-against-registration-fraud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Leeper</title>
		<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/texas-wins-round-in-fight-against-registration-fraud/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Leeper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/texas-wins-round-in-fight-against-registration-fraud/#comment-452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need new restrictions like those in TX.  AZ needs to restrict petition circulators to AZ residents and non-felons only, maybe even restrict circulators to volunteer, nonpaid only.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need new restrictions like those in TX.  AZ needs to restrict petition circulators to AZ residents and non-felons only, maybe even restrict circulators to volunteer, nonpaid only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 76acres</title>
		<link>http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/texas-wins-round-in-fight-against-registration-fraud/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[76acres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electionlawcenter.com/uncategorized/texas-wins-round-in-fight-against-registration-fraud/#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least two of the Texas Election Code provisions stayed by the district court have been in effect since the 1980s. It’s the Democrats’ narrative that the Republicans are actively disenfranchising voters. Nope, two those were passed before the Republicans took control. The media, of course, blindly accept the Democrats’ version and never checks what the Democrats tell them.&lt;br /&gt;The voter registrar in Harris County posted this some time ago: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hctax.net/News/PR/2012/Misc/MythsTruth.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hctax.net/News/PR/2012/Misc/MythsTruth.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt; And a separate story tip: &lt;br /&gt;Check this: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Judge-says-Oliver-to-remain-on-ballot-3841639.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Judge-says-Oliver-to-remain-on-ballot-3841639.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The Harris County, Texas Democratic Party tried to remove a candidate who won the primary. They used an old argument, that the party was a private association. The SAME argument was used by the Democratic Party in adjacent Fort Bend County in the 1940’s to justify and ALL WHITE primary.  More details in the comments on the story.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least two of the Texas Election Code provisions stayed by the district court have been in effect since the 1980s. It’s the Democrats’ narrative that the Republicans are actively disenfranchising voters. Nope, two those were passed before the Republicans took control. The media, of course, blindly accept the Democrats’ version and never checks what the Democrats tell them.<br />The voter registrar in Harris County posted this some time ago: <a href="http://www.hctax.net/News/PR/2012/Misc/MythsTruth.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hctax.net/News/PR/2012/Misc/MythsTruth.pdf</a><br /> And a separate story tip: <br />Check this: <br /><a href="http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Judge-says-Oliver-to-remain-on-ballot-3841639.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Judge-says-Oliver-to-remain-on-ballot-3841639.php</a><br /> The Harris County, Texas Democratic Party tried to remove a candidate who won the primary. They used an old argument, that the party was a private association. The SAME argument was used by the Democratic Party in adjacent Fort Bend County in the 1940’s to justify and ALL WHITE primary.  More details in the comments on the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
