DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz in an interview: “The assistant attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez, has assured Americans and members of Congress that the Voting Section [at DOJ] is looking very closely at the laws that have recently passed. They’ve acknowledged the concern that both I and others have expressed about the potential for these laws to have an undue and disproportionate impact on racial minorities and the poor. I trust that Tom Perez and Attorney General Eric Holder are reviewing these laws very seriously.”
MORE at PJ Tatler.
Since the SC has ruled such laws are constitutional, what will the the CRD tactic to attack them?
Editor Comment: The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled that such laws are constitutional. It only ruled that Indiana’s did not violate the law. There is a great deal of daylight in between those positions.
Any predictions for the outcome of any new challenges?