Author Archives: ELECTIONLAWCENTER.COM

Philadelphia Documents November 2012 Election “Challenges,” “Problems”



Philadelphia is no stranger to
stories of election “irregularities” and voter fraud, and a Report to the City Commissioners on the November 2012 General Election confirms a number of procedural problems and illegal activities, including proof that ACORN-style voter registration practices continue in Philadelphia, courtesy of Obama for America and others:


 


From April 25, 2012 through October 9, 2012 the Voter Registration Office received 196,764 voter registration applications. This volume included registrations that were fraudulent, missing information, or not for Philadelphia residents… Some applications were turned in months after they had been filled out, so many individuals submitted duplicate applications…


 


In July, representatives from our staff and the Commissioners’ Offices requested a meeting with local representatives from Obama for America to discuss the concerns about the delays… less than an hour before the registration deadline, tens of thousands of applications were submitted by various organizations, including Obama for America, the Community Voter Project, and Grassroots Voter Outreach. Some of these applications dated back to early September.


 


 


And this, on votes reported stolen by voter impersonation fraud:


 


On Election Day, the City Commissioners Office was notified of five separate instances in which an individual claimed that there was already a signature next to their name in the poll books when they arrived to vote at their polling place. A further review of this issue is necessary to determine the cause and to verify the validity of these claims.


 


As with other crimes that have a low probability of prosecution, many more cases may go unreported.  But even in these documented cases, who will – or can – be prosecuted?  Not the fraudsters, who misrepresented their identities.  So these incidents will likely remain footnotes in a report, signaling fraudsters that they can continue to cheat unimpeded.  Meanwhile, deniers will continue to claim that this type of fraud is “non-existent” because there are no convictions and oppose the voter ID laws that could prevent it.

Partisan Incivility on the Internet is Forever

What do you do when you turn into an embarrassing national news story of incivility after leading a chorus of boos against Paul Ryan?  Naturally delete the Twitter account that started the story – except you can’t.

Future defendants in DOJ Voting Section cases can gain access to the archive to harvest the partisan tweets, or just email one of the tech gurus covering the story.

In Ohio, “Uniformity sought in voter fraud review”

Ohio Secretary of State attempts to set the parameters of official county review of allegations from the 2012 election.


Husted’s order says election boards must hold public hearings with court
reporters creating official transcripts of the hearings. The directive
also orders any testimony provided to the boards must be given under
oath and all sworn statements must be limited to first-hand knowledge of
the allegation

The directive also orders elections boards, when dealing with
allegations of voter suppression, voter fraud, and or election
falsification, to vote on whether or not to forward each a allegation to
the county’s prosecuting attorney for review and that any allegations
being forwarded to the county’s prosecuting attorney will also be
forwarded to the Secretary of State’s election counsel.

Democrats take out redistricting anger on Virginia drivers and roads

In Richmond, the Times Dispatch reports:


Senate Republicans this afternoon pushed through a surprise rewrite of the 2011 redistricting plan that erases a Democratic seat in western Virginia and creates a sixth majority black district that would be located between Petersburg and Danville.

…Sen. Richard L. Saslaw, D-Fairfax, the Democratic leader, reacted angrily to the move, saying “It’s totally over on transportation.”

In redistricting tweak, Virginia GOP increases minority representation in state senate

Yesterday, Virginia Republicans increased Black minority-majority representation in the state senate by one seat; however, the Democrats cry foul and threaten litigation.  This was a move that Virginia Democrats should have made when they held power but were more interested in trying to create a partisan firewall and protect a narrow artificial edge held in 2011.

Watkins said he realized the plan “would come as a surprise” to
Democrats, but is in line with the federal Voting Rights Act. He said it
increases black representation in the Senate in line with Virginia’s
population breakdown.
  Watkins argued that because the state has had only five black
majority districts for the past 22 years the state is out of compliance
with the Voting Rights Act.
“It will clean up the lines, protect
us against the threat of litigation, and provide an excellent
opportunity to allow the demographics of this Senate to more closely
align with those of the commonwealth at large,” Watkins said.

But Democrats are crying foul, saying the plan is really intended to give Republicans an outright majority in the chamber.

…Sen. Mamie Locke, D-Hampton,
who heads the Virginia Black Legislative Caucus, said she supports the
creation of sixth minority-majority district, just not in the way it was
handled by her Republican colleagues.

New York Times reports “less restrictive voter ID” is top 5 issue of Obama Administration

So voter ID is right up there with gun violence and climate change.  I guess “fixing those lines” is out the door and it is back to demonizing the confirmation of identity of voters, an issue that was a non-issue in the administration of the election.

The New  York Times reports: “What Mr. Obama wants to achieve this term is pretty clear: a fiscal deal and overhauls of gun and immigration laws, steps to address climate change and less restrictive voter identification laws.”

I actually find this hard to believe and the New York Times has it wrongHe has little control on the issue in the states and there are many more pressing problems in our country, yet he throws out voter ID in his top 5 priorities.  No wonder the Holder DOJ fought so hard to politicize voter ID and use Section 5 to delay enactment across the country by any means necessary.  The orders came straight from the White House.  

“Getting out a self-dug hole”

Latest at Campaignfreedom.org:

“Since the Citizens United and SpeechNow decisions,
politicians and political parties have struggled under self-imposed
campaign finance laws that once gave them total dominance over the
political sphere.  Although lauded as anti-corruption measures, strict
campaign finance laws mainly prevented political insurgents from gaining
enough of a voice to seriously challenge incumbents.

Without a corruption nexus and with their newly restored
constitutional protections, outside groups have become significant
political players and serious rivals to the traditional party
establishment.  As a result, politicians and political parties are in
the process of dismantling many of the regulations that they once used
to achieve their dominance.



One such restriction is a limit on aggregate contributions. 
Currently set at $117,000 per election cycle, the limit is facing two
Supreme Court challenges
.”

Fulton County Elections Subpoenaed in Investigation by GA Secretary of State

There seem to be real problems in Fulton County, Georgia with the proper administration of elections.  None of these issues were widespread elsewhere in Georgia.

Georgia Secretary of State says the county’s elections board is not
cooperating with his investigation of the county’s management of recent
elections and refuses to turn over requested documents.

Why is Secretary Kemp investigating?

The Secretary of State’s office received 111 complaints about the
county’s management of the Nov. 6 presidential election. The complaints
allege that the department’s mismanagement of the election forced
thousands of voters to use paper ballots and caused long lines which
could have led some voters to leave and not return before casting their
ballots.  Many Buckhead voters experienced the long lines and frustration of not being located on their voting precinct’s list of registered voters, forcing them to cast provisional ballots.

On Election Day in November, Fulton County polling sites faced a slew
of problems: outdated voter registration rolls, broken machines and
even power outages. One polling location in south Fulton opened late
because the polling managers there did not have the correct keys to
unlock the voting machines.

This is a reminder that often local problems with long lines and
dysfunctional administration of elections is a local problem, not some
policy issue on the federal or state level or inherent racism.  Sometimes it is just incompetent poll workers, lack of training, unreliable voting equipment, and the lack of management skills in local election offices.  It is encouraging to
see the Georgia Secretary of State try to bring some sunshine to the failures in the hope that the investigation will identify the
fundamental reasons for the breakdown in Fulton County and provide possible solutions to guarantee clean and competently run elections.