Some will point to the fact that Representative Miller is a woman as the reason she was chosen for this committee chairman position. However, as the former Secretary of State in Michigan, this pick makes a lot of sense for the committee in the House of Representatives that deals with voting issues. With Congressmen Rokita and Harper again serving, the committee will have a growing wealth of experience on voting issues. Link to the story in Roll Call.
Author Archives: ELECTIONLAWCENTER.COM
Money: Senators Propose Federal Fines for Local and State Election Officials
Senators Sanders and Whitehouse have proposed an amendment to the Defense authorization bill to fine local election officials up to $220,000 for not sending UOCAVA ballots out on time.
The text of the UOCAVA amendments:
At the end of division A, add the following:
TITLE XVIII–AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORMED AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS ABSENTEE VOTING ACT
SEC. 1801. PRE-ELECTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ON AVAILABILITY AND TRANSMISSION OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS.
(a) In General.–Subsection (c) of section 102 of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-1(c)) is amended by striking “Not later than 90 days” and inserting the following:
“(1) PRE-ELECTION REPORT ON ABSENTEE BALLOT AVAILABILITY.–Not later than 55 days before any election for Federal office held in a State, such State shall submit a report to the Attorney General and the Presidential Designee, and make that report publicly available that same day, certifying that absentee ballots are or will be available for transmission by 46 days before the election. The report shall be in a form prescribed by the Attorney General and shall require the State to certify specific information about ballot availability from each unit of local government which will administer the election.
“(2) PRE-ELECTION REPORT ON ABSENTEE BALLOTS TRANSMITTED.–Not later than 43 days before any election for Federal office held in a State, such State shall submit a report to the Attorney General and the Presidential Designee, and make that report publicly available that same day, certifying whether all absentee ballots validly requested by absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters whose requests were received by the 46th day before the election have been transmitted to such voters by such date. The report shall be in a form prescribed by the Attorney General and shall require the State to certify specific information about ballot transmission, including the total numbers of ballot requests received and ballots transmitted, from each unit of local government which will administer the election.
“(3) POST ELECTION REPORT ON NUMBER OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS TRANSMITTED AND RECEIVED.–Not later than 90 days”.
(b) Conforming Amendment.–The heading for subsection (c) of section 102 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-1(c)) is amended by striking “Report on Number of Absentee Ballots Transmitted and Received” and inserting “Reports on Absentee Ballots”
SEC. 1802. TRANSMISSION REQUIREMENTS; REPEAL OF WAIVER PROVISION.
(a) In General.–Paragraph (8) of section 102(a) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-1(a)) is amended to read as follows:
“(8) transmit a validly requested absentee ballot to an absent uniformed services voter or overseas voter by the date and in the manner determined under subsection (g);”.
(b) Ballot Transmission Requirements and Repeal of Waiver Provision.–Subsection (g) of section 102 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-1(g)) is amended to read as follows:
“(g) Ballot Transmission Requirements.–
“(1) IN GENERAL.–For purposes of subsection (a)(8), in the case in which a valid request for an absentee ballot is received at least 46 days before an election for Federal office, the following rules shall apply:
“(A) IN GENERAL.–The State shall transmit the absentee ballot not later than 46 days before the election.
“(B) SPECIAL RULES IN CASE OF FAILURE TO TRANSMIT ON TIME.–
“(i) IN GENERAL.–If the State fails to transmit any absentee ballot by the 46th day before the election as required by subparagraph (A) and the absent uniformed services voter or overseas voter did not request electronic ballot submission pursuant to subsection (f), the State shall transmit such ballot by express delivery.
“(ii) EXTENDED FAILURE.–If the State fails to transmit any absentee ballot by the 41st day before the election, in addition to transmitting the ballot as provided in clause (i), the State shall–
“(I) in the case of absentee ballots requested by absent uniformed services voters with respect to regularly scheduled general elections, notify such voters of the procedures established under section 103A for the
collection and delivery of marked absentee ballots; and
“(II) in any other case, provide, at the State’s expense, for the return of such ballot by express delivery.
“(iii) ENFORCEMENT.–A State’s compliance with this subparagraph does not bar the Attorney General from seeking additional remedies necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Act.
“(2) REQUESTS RECEIVED AFTER 46TH DAY BEFORE ELECTION.–For purposes of subsection (a)(8), in the case in which a valid request for an absentee ballot is received less than 46 days before an election for Federal office, the State shall transmit the absentee ballot–
“(A) in accordance with State law; and
“(B) if practicable and as determined appropriate by the State, in a manner that expedites the transmission of such absentee ballot.”.
SEC. 1803. CLARIFICATION OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY, CIVIL PENALTIES, AND PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.
(a) Enforcement.–Section 105 (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-4) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act is amended to read as follows:
“SEC. 105. ENFORCEMENT.
“(a) In General.–The Attorney General may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court for such declaratory or injunctive relief as may be necessary to carry out this title. In any such action, the only necessary party defendant is the State and it shall not be a defense to such action that local election officials are not also named as defendants.
“(b) Civil Penalty.–In a civil action brought under subsection (a), if the court finds that a State violated any provision of this Act, it may, to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty against the State–
“(1) in an amount not exceeding $110,000, for a first violation; and
“(2) in an amount not exceeding $220,000, for any subsequent violation.
“(c) Report to Congress.–Not later than December 31 of each year, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress an annual report on any civil action brought under subsection (a) during the preceding year.
“(d) Private Right of Action.–A person who is aggrieved by a State’s violation of this Act, may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court for such declaratory or injunctive relief as may be necessary to carry out this Act.
“(e) Attorney’
s Fees.–In a civil action under this section, the court may allow the prevailing party (other than the United States) reasonable attorney’s fees, including litigation expenses, and costs.”.
(b) Repeal of Clarification Regarding Delegation of State Responsibility.–Section 576 of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-1 note) is repealed.
SEC. 1804. TREATMENT OF EARLY BALLOT REQUESTS.
(a) Application of Prohibition of Refusal of Applications on Grounds of Early Submission to Overseas Voters.–Section 104 of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-3) is amended–
(1) by inserting “or overseas voter” after “submitted by an absent uniformed services voter”; and
(2) by inserting “or who do not reside outside the United States” after “who are not members of the uniformed services”.
(b) Use of Single Application for Subsequent Elections.–
(1) IN GENERAL.–Section 104 of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-3) is amended–
(A) by striking “A State” and inserting the following:
“(a) Prohibition of Refusal of Applications on Grounds of Early Submission.–A State”, and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(b) Application Treated as Valid for Subsequent Elections.–
“(1) IN GENERAL.–If a State accepts and processes a request for an absentee ballot by an absent uniformed services voter or overseas voter and the voter requests that the application be considered an application for an absentee ballot for each subsequent election for Federal office held in the State through the next regularly scheduled general election for Federal office (including any runoff elections which may occur as a result of the outcome of such general election), the State shall provide an absentee ballot to the voter for each such subsequent election.
“(2) EXCEPTION FOR VOTERS CHANGING REGISTRATION .–Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a voter registered to vote in a State for any election held after the voter notifies the State that the voter no longer wishes to be registered to vote in the State or after the State determines that the voter has registered to vote in another State.”.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.–The heading of section 104 of such Act is amended by striking “PROHIBITION OF REFUSAL OF APPLICATIONS ON GROUNDS OF EARLY SUBMISSION” and inserting “TREATMENT OF EARLY BALLOT REQUESTS”.
SEC. 1805. APPLICABILITY TO COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.
Paragraph (6) and (8) of section 107 of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-6(6)) are each amended by striking “and American Samoa” and inserting “American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands”.
Sing Me Back Home: “Reynolds hopes for ‘redemption’ in race for Jackson seat”
Chicago Tribune: One sign urged voters to “re-elect” the former U.S. representative “so he can finish the work” that was interrupted when he was convicted of crimes that included having sex with an underage campaign volunteer.”
“A pair of campaign signs taped to the walls of a Loop hotel meeting room offered a shorthand explanation for the congressional campaign of convicted child sex offender and federal fraud felon Mel Reynolds.
Harvest: “The Real Lesson of the Election”
“In James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas videos, we saw how easy it was for even a congressman’s son — in this case, Pat Moran, son of Jim — to cross the line from harvesting to cheating. Early voting makes harvesting all the more economical. Fewer people on the ground can get more accomplished. At an Obama rally at Ohio State, my friends in Columbus tell me, the Obama campaign provided a steady stream of busses to take rally-goers right to the polls, one stop shopping.”
Link.
Dazed and Confused: Nursing Home Assistors
American Thinker:
Jimmy Green’s stepdaughter had never voted before. The 57-year-old is mentally disabled, and Green said she doesn’t understand the concept of casting a ballot. But this week, she called her parents to say she had voted for President Obama. The care home in Fayetteville where she lives registered its residents to vote and drove them to the polls[.] … “My concern is that somebody told her who to vote for,” he said. “She didn’t even know there’s two different parties
Comfortably Numb: Activation of the Unmotivated
A discussion of new techniques employed in 2012: Rutenberg learned that the president’s campaign team found it could advertise more effectively with its own data rather than the standard commercial television advertising approach based on demographic data such as age groupings. As a result, the Obama campaign told Rutenberg it bought ads on late-night programs such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” “Late Night with Jimmy Fallon,” ESPN, and even TV Land, a cable network featuring reruns of old TV programs. Their effort was to try to reach less political voters, who would be making up their minds about who to vote for, and whether to vote at all, closer to the election.”
“Among the tactics that helped the Obama campaign maximize its effectiveness was in-depth analysis of the TV viewing habits of people considered marginally likely to vote, according to Jim Rutenberg of The New York Times.
If you wondered why democrats oppose voter ID so ferociously, this tells you something. It’s not that they don’t have ID (that’s what they say so they can enjoy use of the civil rights statutes). But the real reason is that the unmotivated are more likely to have lost, misplaced or forgotten it when being roused to go to the polls.
Freeze Frame: Texas Voter ID Suit on Ice
The End: “Last House race brings 2012 election to an end”
Police Blotter in Minnesota: In Person Voter Impersonation
We hear endlessly from Voter ID opponents how there have only been a handful of reports of in-person voter impersonation since the dawn of time. They can add this one to the list from a state with no voter ID law.
“Civil Rights Reactionaries”
Wall Street Journal: “Nostalgia for the Voting Rights Act.”
“For a pair who work for something called the Constitutional Accountability Center, Kendall and Phelps don’t have a lot to say about the constitution. Their defense of Section 5 is purely sentimental, with lots of intensifying adjectives and adverbs. Shelby County v. Holder, they exclaim, is “a monumentally important challenge to a key part of the Voting Rights Act, the iconic law for which for which [sic] Mr. Guyot shed blood.”
What Taranto doesn’t report that this outfit, like so many others, is funded by George Soros.