Author Archives: ELECTIONLAWCENTER.COM

“Early Voting in Florida wasn’t hurt by new law”

The Daytona Beach News-Journal provides its opinion on how early voting under the new law increased turnout and resulted in a victory for Florida Republicans:

Lost in the heated rhetoric and debate on early voting in Florida
is the fact that the Sunshine State has already had a big election in
2012 — and early-voting turnout was great.  Early voting in the
August 2012 primary was up 52 percent from August 2008. This impressive
showing followed the Republican-dominated Legislature’s passage of a
controversial election law that, among other things, decreased the
number of days in which in-person early voting was allowed.

Voters, apparently, can find their way to thepolls
— when real issues motivate them. Issues and hot elections drive
turnout. The length of the early-voting period — now eight days —
matters less. Previously,
election supervisors could offer up to 14 days of early voting. That
was changed in 2011 to eight days. State officials said 367,000 people
took advantage of early voting in the Aug. 14 primary. In the August
2008 primary, 240,000 voters cast ballots early, over more days.

…On Wednesday, Gov. Rick Scott and the GOP won a battle in federal court, when Eric Holder, the U.S. attorney general, said he would accept the state’s eight-day early voting plan
in five counties that the federal government regulates because of past
racial discrimination. Those counties are Monroe, Hillsborough, Collier,
Henry and Hardee. Because of the federal regulation, those counties
were exempted from new rules in August — but they now have to follow
most of Florida’s 2011 election law.

The
Justice Department is asking the state to still offer 96 hours of early
voting, in the eight days, which Scott plans to do. Scott’s plan also
has voting on a Sunday that previously did not have voting, according to
the Associated Press.

But
that doesn’t satisfy critics who believe black voters use early voting
more on the Sunday immediately preceding the general election. Florida
won’t be offering it then. Instead, according to the Florida Division of
Elections website, early voting begins 10 days before an election and
ends on the third day before any election in which there is a state or
federal office race.

“The Bitter Failure of the MOVE Act”

The Virginia-Pilot opines:  Congress passed a law in 2009 designed to make voter registration easier
for the nation’s service members. The Pentagon defied that law, and the
results are obvious. So is the military’s decision to abandon its
obligation to protect the rights of its soldiers, sailors, airmen and
Marines.

Of course, there are the apologists at the Overseas Vote Foundation (@https://twitter.com/overseasvote) who are looking for a different word than the extremist word “failure.” 


overseas Vote
@overseasvote

VA-Pilot slams on MOVE Act. “Failure” is extreme. But yes, MOVE needs balance of online & in-person outreach


Failure must be too harsh a term for the organization that purports to represent overseas citizens.  How about disappointment, fiasco, disaster, miscarriage, breakdown, malfunction, or ruin?  Pick one.

USS FVAP: A Sinking Ship

As ELC has been reporting, there have been
serious storm clouds brewing at the Federal Voting Assistance Program
(FVAP). Those clouds have resulted from reports about expected low
military voter participation in 2012, a blistering DOD IG report
identifying widespread failures to comply with the MOVE Act and data reliability issues, and questions related to the waste of $75 million
in congressional appropriations.  Surprisingly,
several current and former FVAP employees are quietly blaming this mess
on Bob Carey, the former Director of FVAP.   Perhaps this explains his
unexpected jump from the ship in May.  Or it may be a convenient scapegoat for those now responsible for supporting our military and overseas voters.  We will have more on this in the
future.

“Senator Cornyn criticizes lack of voter assistance to military”

The Houston Chronicle reports:

For members of the military serving overseas, there’s another battle being fought on the home front: registering and voting in this year’s presidential election.

And those looking for help might be out of luck.

A report released Aug. 31 shows the Department of Defense could not reach about half of 219 required voter assistance offices, prompting an angry letter from Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act cosponsor Sen. John Cornyn

IBD: “Obama To Soldiers Overseas: No Voting For You!”

Last week, however, the Pentagon’s inspector general reported that
attempts to locate and contact IVAO offices at overseas military
installations failed about half the time.

“Results were clear. Our attempts to contact IVAOs failed about 50%
of the time,” the inspector general reported. “We concluded the Services
had not established all the IVAOs as intended by the MOVE Act because,
among other issues, the funding was not available.”

The estimated cost of establishing functioning IVAOs at all overseas
military bases not in combat zones is estimated at between $15 million
and $20 million a year. We wasted $530 million on Solyndra but can’t
afford a relative pittance to ensure our soldiers are not
disenfranchised.

Investors.com link to full story.   Ouch.

“GOP Senators cite unacceptable violations of military voting law in letter to DoD”

At the link, quoting from the letter:  With great disappointment, we have concluded that the Department of
Defense (DoD) stands in clear violation of a central provision of this
federal law, which mandated the creation of on-base voter assistance
offices. The price of DoD’s failure to follow the law will likely be
paid this November by military service members and their families, whose
voting rights were to have been safeguarded by this provision.

“Mexican Man Admits to Voter Fraud”


A Mexican who was deported decades ago for drug trafficking pleaded guilty this week to living illegally in Escondido under a false identity and fraudulently voting in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, federal authorities said Friday.  Ricardo Lopez-Munguia, 45, pleaded guilty Thursday to attempted entry to the U.S. after deportation, making a false claim to U.S. citizenship, and voter fraud by an illegal alien, according to a statement from the U.S. attorney’s office.


 


Guilty.  Of voter fraud.  Yet the North County Times thinks it’s relevant to point out that


 


Despite accusations often leveled during or after elections, proven cases of voter fraud are exceedingly rare, according to several studies and reports.  A policy brief by the New York University School of Law’s non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice said that voter fraud is “essentially irrational” and “a singularly foolish way to attempt to win an election”… Many instances of alleged voter fraud are later discovered to be simple clerical errors.


 


Ignore the facts – the Brennan Center says voter fraud is “irrational” so how could it occur?  Or maybe it was just a “clerical error.”   


 


Denying the fraud even while reporting it.

ACLU, LULAC oppose Iowa citizen voter verifications from federal database

A judge heard arguments Thursday over whether Iowa Secretary of State
Matt Schultz exceeded his authority in a search for thousands of
possible ineligible voters before November’s election. Attorneys
for the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and a Latino advocacy
group, League of United Latin American Citizens, argued for an
injunction to halt an effort to check identities against a federal
immigration database to determine citizenship.

..[Deputy state attorney general Jeffrey] Thompson, however, said the groups have misinterpreted the rule. By
eliminating access to the federal database, the likelihood increases
that the state will mistakenly challenge citizens’ right to vote. He
also noted that the emergency rule would only be in effect for this
election cycle. After November’s election, Schultz’s office will solicit
public comment and adjust the rules if needed, he said.
   Link at the Des Moines Register

15 in North Dakota charged with voter petition fraud

Fifteen people were charged Friday with violating North Dakota
election law, many of them telling investigators they forged names on
petitions they circulated in order to meet quotas and to achieve bonus
pay.One defendant told an investigator every signature he turned
in was forged. Thirteen of the 15 defendants are either current or
former players on the North Dakota State University football team.
  Full story here.