Donna Brazille picks up where where yesterday’s New York Times editorial left off:

“Republicans have knowingly trumpeted false claims about rampant voter fraud. They know these claims to be false. Indeed, every effort to demonstrate widespread fraud at the ballot box has failed to turn up evidence that such fraud exists.”

I suppose the insertion of the words “rampant” and “widespread” is what makes the statement defensible.  Some people have higher tolerances for fraud than others.  Some have different views as to what constitutes “rampant” and “widespread.”