Unsurprising dismissal of a lawsuit brought under the Voting Rights Act. The Court:
“[P]laintiffs’ vague reference to ‘state bylaws’ gives this court no inkling as to which of the 50 states and which of the millions of pages of bylaws plaintiffs refer. Similarly, plaintiffs’ use of the passive voice renders it impossible to discern who broke the bones of whom, who pointed a gun at whom, and whether any of the more than 100 defendants were even involved. Finally, plaintiffs’ vague allegations of voting ballot fraud occurring somewhere at sometime and apparently committed simultaneously by all ‘defendants’ lacks plausibility. While plaintiffs make an oblique reference to a voting machine somewhere in Arizona, the lack of clarity in this allegation is insufficient to raise it to a level above mere speculation.”
This little story tells us that all our “ducks must be in a row”. Like Sgt. Joe Friday would say, “Just the facts, ma’am.”