Monthly Archives: September 2011

Gov. Rick Perry and the Presidential Briar Patch

Civil Rights groups are trying to taint Texas Governor Rick Perry for his support of Voter ID laws in Texas.  You can only imagine this is a fight Perry wants.  Voter ID is wildly popular among the public, with support ranging near 85% in some polls, and among a majority of Democrats and African-Americans, as well as white Republicans.  Yet, reflexively, some groups, including the Soros-funded Demos, have sent a letter to the Voting Section at Justice complaining about the racially discriminatory actions of those in Texas who passed Voter ID.  Politico has more here, and the letter.  If Justice blocks voter ID anywhere, expect this to explode into a Presidential campaign issue overnight, and the supporters of voter ID will have a mighty political tailwind.

Oklahoma: “Voter ID creates few hassles”

Reports from yesterday’s elections in Oklahoma from Tulsa World:

Shelly Boggs, assistant secretary of the Tulsa County Election Board, said about two dozen voters were required to complete provisional ballots because they did not have proper identification. In the majority of cases, voters either presented IDs that were expired or did not have an ID.

The number is about twice what the Election Board sees during a municipal election, Boggs said.

But “it was nothing like we thought it might be,” she added.

Latest at Pajamas Media: Every Single One, the Criminal Section at DOJ

The latest installment of the Every Single One series is up at Pajamas Media. It relates to the criminal section at the Civil Rights Division. I discuss more about the activities of this section in my forthcoming book, Injustice. But for now, a portion of the Pajamas Media piece today:

As I wrote before, a pretextual hiring standard is being employed. Division leaders, of course, aren’t calling it a “liberal” litmus test; they are instead referring to it as a requirement that all successful candidates have “civil rights experience.” But their definition of “civil rights experience” only includes prior employment, membership, or affiliation with left-wing advocacy organizations.


Worse, Loretta King, while serving as the acting assistant attorney general for civil rights at the outset of the Obama administration, ordered the resumes of highly qualified applicants to be rejected only because they didn’t have political or left-wing civil rights experience. Multiple DOJ sources with direct knowledge of hiring committee practices have confirmed this to me.


So what does the corrupted hiring mean to the average American? It means if you go to the Wisconsin State Fair and are beaten because you are white, your federal government will do nothing for you, even as it would act if attacker and attacked races were reversed. It means if you are Marty Marshall standing in your front yard watching fireworks with your family, and are attacked  by a mob yelling “this is our world. This is a black world,” don’t expect DOJ to act. It means if you are Dick Retta and are pepper-sprayed by a liberal for praying and exercising federal rights to protest abortion, don’t expect the law to protect you.


What does it mean? It means we have reached that dangerous line crossed in past civilizations where the law appears to apply to some, but not to all. This is un-American, and must stop. Otherwise, Americans will stop it next year at the ballot box.

TN Speaker defends voter ID, turns table on US Senators

Tennessee Speaker of the House Beth Harwell defends voter ID laws and turns the tables on U.S. Senators Dick Durbin and Al Franken.  More at the Tennessean:

“I would suggest to our federal officials that they get their own house in order first. In an era of rising deficits, ballooning debt, and bloated federal government in Washington Dick Durbin and Jim Cooper have chosen to ignore those problems and come to Tennessee to trample on states’ rights. No wonder Congress has an 82 percent disapproval rating. Congressman Cooper has assumed the Washington mentality of not respecting states’ rights.

Pitkin County (CO) to use Spanish ballot despite uncertain obligation

Pitkin County Colorado has decided to print ballots in Spanish despite having no legal obligation to do so.  Election official Dwight Shellman noted that Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act currently does not require Spanish language ballots in Pitkin Colorado, but that they will print them anyhow for the November election:

The county has ordered about 10,000 ballots, the printing of which will cost about $4,300. In addition, it ordered envelopes for mailing them out, and separate envelopes that voters can use to return their ballot to the Clerk and Recorder’s Office. All of the items would need to be in both languages if the county were to run a dual-language election.

Instead, the county is working on the finishing touches of a dual-language sample ballot that voters can pick up at the clerk’s office or view online. Shellman said his office is also willing to put one in the mail to anyone who requests one. Individuals who are more comfortable reading Spanish can use it as a guide as they fill out their official ballot, he said.

“I think it’s a good service that we can provide,” Shellman said.

Shellman said he doubts that Pitkin County would have to provide dual-language voters under the federal criteria anyway (the census counted 716 county residents who identified themselves as Spanish-speakers), but said getting the ballot translated has been a worthy exercise.

Breaking News: Alabama skips DOJ redistricting approval – straight to court

Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange won’t take a chance on an unfair Department of Justice objection to Alabama’s redistricting plans.  He is going straight to United States District Court. 

Of course the Associated Press misses the bus when it asks: “Officials in the attorney general’s office did not immediately say why the request was made directly to the court.” 

Why?  Here are a few reasons why, and here.

Breaking News: New York still won’t comply with military voter protections by 2012

You can’t make this stuff up.  New York has asked the Department of Defense for a waiver from the provisions of federal law protection military voters – for the 2012 election.  The cover letter is here from Robert Brehm, the elections director and the waiver application is here.

The MOVE Act, the law at issue, passed in October 2009.  Two years later, New York still isn’t protecting military voters.

Aurora (CO) man found guilty of voting twice multiple times

At the Denver Post:

A 70-year-old Aurora man will be sentenced Thursday for voting twice in county elections in 2008 and again in 2009 — a case he called “the biggest joke in the world.”



David Harold Shackley, a registered Republican, was convicted by an Arapahoe County jury last month.


Prosecutors said Shackley voted early in Denver County in 2008, then turned in a mail-in ballot in Arapahoe County that same election, according to a press release from the 18th judicial district attorney’s office.



 

R.I. voter ID law hailed at U.S. Senate hearing

Here is link


Rhode Island’s controversial voter-identification legislation was among those hailed by conservatives in testimony last Thursday before a U.S. Senate subcommittee examining new voter laws passed by state legislatures this year.

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, quoted from Governor Chafee’s defense of the law, saying “requiring identification at the polling place is a reasonable request to ensure the accuracy and integrity of our elections.”

He also cited a quote from state Sen. Harold Metts, a Providence Democrat who co-sponsored the legislation. He defended the law this way: “[A]s a minority citizen and senior citizen I would not support anything that I thought would represent obstacles or limit protections.