Link here.  The Left views the U.S. Court of Appeals for DC ruling as a blow to campaign finance reform.  The LA Times more accurately describes the ruling as the court essentially found that you cannot just write something into the law (disclosure) that the Congress did not legislate just because it might be a good thing:

A U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington on Tuesday overturned a decision
requiring organizations that run election-related television ads to
reveal their funders, saying a lower court erred in finding that
Congress intended to require such disclosure — a victory for some of the
biggest groups participating in the 2012 campaign

Link here.  The Left views the U.S. Court of Appeals for DC ruling as a blow to campaign finance reform.  The LA Times more accurately describes the ruling as the court essentially found that you cannot just write something into the law (disclosure) that the Congress did not legislate just because it might be a good thing:

A U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington on Tuesday overturned a decision
requiring organizations that run election-related television ads to
reveal their funders, saying a lower court erred in finding that
Congress intended to require such disclosure — a victory for some of the
biggest groups participating in the 2012 campaign