Texas AG compromise plan doesn’t satisfy all minority advocacy groups

Boy, that is a surpise.  The story at Roll Call.  Apparently the Western District Court of Texas doesn’t yet appreciate the fact that you really can’t please everyone… all of the time, ever.  Just as in their initial zealous redrawing of maps that were one-sided toward the plaintiffs, the court has this inexplicable inclination to satisfy each and every desire of the numerous advocacy groups that have sued the State of Texas.  The lower court’s acting on that inclination, ignoring the Texas legislature was specificially why the Supreme Court smacked down their line-drawing.    

So the Western District Court seems literally frozen in place and unable to take any action.  Yet, the court has an independent responsiblity to follow the dictates of the Supreme Court and an obligation to Texas citizens who should be able to participate in a primary election without the disruption of scheduled elections and losses of millions of dollars to counties and cities.  The narrow interests of the few (who themselves have conflicting interests) should not so easily seize up the entire electoral process.