Author Archives: J Christian Adams

Hey, Brian Preston Posted the Cave PDF

Brian Preston has the full PDF of the Obama Cave linked at this PJ Tatler posting, Hey, Look at How the Obama Machine Crushed the Romney Campaignwithout having to sign up for anything. 

“. . . The Cave was to US politics what the Hubble Space Telescope would have been to Neanderthals: An advancement so profound that it verges on magic.

It was also a very non-traditional approach to politics, in that it was less consultant driven than it was data and ability driven. It hired analysts from Silicon Valley rather than the Beltway, one of whom is a particle physicist. Their agile, outside-politics thinking helped build an efficient, ruthlessly data-driven machine that was able to correctly predict the behavior of millions of Americans and make real-time adjustments that produced votes. . . . “

More Wisconsin Voter Fraud

“Prosecutors investigating two suspected cases of voter fraud“

“Milwaukee prosecutors are investigating at least two instances of suspected voter fraud from the presidential election in November, court records reveal.


Assistant District Attorney Bruce Landgraf confirmed Tuesday only that his office is looking at several referrals from area clerks after the November election, and not all of the reviews require subpoenas like those recently made public in the two cases.


In one matter, investigators seek records that might prove Leonard K. Brown voted twice in the November election, once in Milwaukee and again in West Milwaukee. The other suggests a Mukwonago man voted there and in West Allis.”

That good old same day registration.

A question for House Judiciary Chairman Goodlatte on DOJ Voting Section Attorney Dan Freeman


ElectionLawBlog post to an in-depth Daily Caller article and other commentary at National Review Online at the Corner.

My question for the Chairman: How does the Voting Section explain to you how they can fairly enforce the federal voting laws when such partisan behavior is exhibited by DOJ Voting attorney Dan Freeman.  Leading the boos at a national bipartisan televised event, the one day the people of the United States show the world the peaceful transfer or retention of power in our government.   

Follow up Question:  How does an attorney, who supposedly swore an oath to the Constitution and equal protection under the law, fairly uphold the scales of Justice when he is willing to oppose one party with such vehemence and fury?  Do we trust attorneys such as Dan Freeman to objectively utilize the invasive powers of Section 5 in a fair and equitable manner?

There should be some explaining to your committee.

The Soros Pedigree of the New NAACP-LDF Head

The new head of the NAACP LDF is leaving her position with George Soros’ Open Society Foundations to assume her new job.  Also, several Baltimore law firms have promised big checks to the NAACP LDF, a group which has fought against election integrity measures in places like Florida, Texas and South Carolina.   Happy to publish the names of the firms if you want to email them.  From the Washington Post piece:



“Taking the top job at LDF requires sacrifices, starting with a lengthy commute. She no longer has time to pursue her broad interests and has given up directing the children’s choir at Mount Calvary AME Church in Towson and her seat on the board of the Enoch Pratt Free Library in Baltimore. She will no longer chair the board of George Soros’s Open Society Foundations.


Three days a week, she leaves her home in Baltimore County and lives in New York, where LDF is headquartered. She oversees a staff of 75 split between offices there and in Washington, and she will be responsible for fundraising for the nonprofit, which operates exclusively from donations. She’s off to a good start: Soros’s son Jonathan and his wife donated $100,000 in November — the month Ifill was named to lead LDF. And several Baltimore law firms have pledged five- and six-figure donations for the next several years. LDF’s 25 lawyers litigate about 30 cases a year and participate in several more in a “friend of the court” capacity.”