Author Archives: J Christian Adams

Dems force vote to strangle independent free speech by intimidation

 “The Disclose Act would make this and any future administration’s
ability to punish and intimidate its political enemies even easier,”
wrote McConnell, a longtime opponent of campaign finance laws.
  Link

On Monday there will be a forced vote in the Senate as the Democrats desperately seek to harass their opponents and hinder the placement of free speech political advertising on the air.  It’s not very often your political opponent tells you that they are about to grab your neck before they actually attempt to strangle you. 

Cudahy (California) officials threw away ballots, manipulated two elections

The Los Angeles Times has this dramatic election fraud story.   Corruption and manipulation of the city electoral process at so many levels.

Cudahy officials at the city’s highest levels
tampered with and manipulated the results of at least two city
elections, according to federal documents released Thursday.  The documents were part of the plea agreements of two Cudahy city officials who agreed to plead guilty Thursday to bribery and extortion.

But the documents also shed light on a culture of corruption within
City Hall, with examples of widespread bribery and developer payoffs to
voter fraud.  “The very definition of democracy is that all those qualified as
voters have the opportunity to cast their votes and to have those votes
counted,” Assistant U.S. Atty. Joseph Akrotirianakis said.

Details of the election fraud were spelled out by Angel Perales, the city’s former interim city
manager and code enforcement director. Perales and former mayor David
Silva have agreed to plead guilty to bribery and extortion.

The documents show that a city official identified only as G.P. asked
Perales and others to make non-residents register to vote in elections.
They used an address that belonged to a Cudahy city employee. In
exchange, that employee was rewarded with promotions and other favorable
treatment, the documents say.

In addition, the city officials tossed out ballots that did not favor incumbents.

Perales said that when absentee ballots were delivered to City Hall,
he and G.P. determined through “trial and error” the best way to open
the sealed envelopes without defacing them. “Routinely and
systematically,” they opened the ballots. If they contained votes in
favor of incumbents, they were resealed and counted. Ballots for
non-incumbents were discarded.


The same process was used during the 2009 election, the documents said.

Clownshow Rolls On: DOJ Expert ID’s Sen. Rodney Ellis as White



How good is the data of the DOJ experts in the Texas Voter ID trial?  Not very good.  The clownshow rolled on today.  Yesterday it was 18 year olds who couldn’t “find the time” to get voter ID. Today it was an expert with a basketful of bad data.  When you hear people talk about number of voters without ID, consider this.

The expert for the DOJ concluded that Rodney Ellis lacked photo ID in the aggregate list of voters he assumed did not have photo ID.  He also identified Ellis was white in the data.

A couple of problems.  First, as more fully discussed here at PJ Media, Ellis is not white, he is black.  From PJ:

“Ellis sounded offended that DOJ’s experts listed his wife and daughter as white. Ellis and his family are black Texans.”

There was another big problem, Ellis also has photo ID, contrary to the expert’s data.  This, of course calls into questions the credibility of the expert, and more importantly, how did DOJ bungle oversight of the expert so badly that white people without photo ID are really black state senators with photo ID?  More on that later.

Here is the bigger danger for DOJ.  DOJ is likely to win this case. 
 
But how is that a danger for DOJ, you ask?  Because they are likely going to win because of the statute, the presumptions contained within Section 5.  They may win because of these presumptions despite the clown show of evidence we’ve seen this week. When the clown show gets before the Supreme Court – which it will – the Justices aren’t going to be too impressed with a statute that allows DOJ to win after putting up expert testimony with incorrectly identified races, experts who report Phil Gramm doesn’t have ID, and 18 year olds who say they can’t find the time to get photo ID.  I can’t think of a worse situation for DOJ to defend Section 5, except perhaps Kinston, N.C.

“AP Changes Story to Minimize Embarrassment to DOJ”

 Breitbart has the story on the assist from AP to the DOJ in the Texas Voter ID trial.

“In version 2.0, Jackson disguises the absurd reason Rodriguez can’t get photo ID. Originally, it was because “her parents were too busy to take her.” In the DOJ-friendly revision, Jackson says she has no “ability to travel.” The ridiculous has become the sympathetic.”