Author Archives: J Christian Adams

Houston Chronicle: Dems should give in on voter ID.

The Houston Chronicle has this editorial suggesting Democrats shouldn’t waste time fighting over Voter ID anymore:



“I would respectfully suggest to my Democratic friends that it is time to punt on this issue and get it behind us. There are three reasons why this would be advantageous to them.


First, the American people are overwhelmingly in favor of it. Opinion polls consistently show that 70 percent to 80 percent of Americans favor some kind of voter identification at the polls. At that level, it is not only Republicans who think this is a good idea. Most independents and even a fair number of Democrats favor it as well. As a general proposition, it is not good politics to defy 70 percent to 80 percent of the American people.”

More at the link above.  State Representative Debbie Riddle is sponsoring the Voter ID bill and it is fast tracked to passage.  As I and others familiar with the Justice Department have written, it would be wise for Texas to bypass DOJ approval of the Voter ID law and go straight to the United States District Court for approval.  This Justice Department is looking for a Voter ID bill to object to.  Texas cannot get a neutral and fair review of whatever bill passes.  It would be cheaper and more efficient to go straight to court.  Just ask the State of Georgia.  They have figured out how to get approval of new voting laws – go straight to court and bypass the Section 5 review process.  Texas should also if they want their voter identification law to become effective.

Debut at NewsReal blog

My first blog at the NewsReal blog is here. 

Eric Holder’s Bipartisan Rebuke

 

Although the story was completely ignored by the mainstream media, Attorney General Eric Holder received a rare bipartisan rebuke last Thursday by the House Judiciary Committee.  At issue was Holder’s decision to ignore the committee’s invitation to have a Justice Department representative testify on whether religious organizations may make religious-based employment based decisions while accepting federal funds.  Full posting at: NewsReal blog.

A Thanksgiving Sacrifice

Hans von Spakovsky says everything that needs to be said this Thanskgiving over at Town Hall. 

 


A Thanksgiving Sacrifice


By Hans A. von Spakovsky


 


As we sit down to feast with our families this holiday, the blessing might well include a word of thanks to the men and women of our armed forces. While we celebrate our national holiday in the warmth and comfort of homes, they serve at grave peril in faraway places like Iraq and Afghanistan.


Some of our troops are in Korea. There an unprovoked attack from the North killed four South Koreans on Tuesday. That outrage reminds us of the continuing danger posed by the murderous thugs in Pyongyang. But it should also spur us to remember those Americans who, 60 years ago, spent Thanksgiving fighting at the Chosin Reservoir in North Korea. It was a vicious, brutal battle and one of the Marine Corps’ finest hours.


 


By Thanksgiving of 1950, X Corps (a joint force composed of American Army and UN troops), had advanced along with the 1st Marine Division deep into North Korea, almost to the Yalu River. But in an attack that caught the Americans by surprise, Chinese troops poured across the border and attacked in almost overwhelming waves.


 


Many units of X Corps disintegrated under the relentless attacks. The Marines, under the command of General Oliver Smith and Marine Corps legend Colonel Chesty Puller, along with elements of the 7th Infantry Division and the British Royal Marines, fought a rear guard action throughout a slow retreat from Chosin. Of course, Smith famously declared, “Gentlemen, we are not retreating. We are merely attacking in another direction.” And he was correct. As a military historian later observed, you can’t retreat when you are completely surrounded.


 


The Marines and their brethren fought against almost overwhelming odds. They were outnumbered five to one. The conditions were atrocious. Temperatures plunged to 30-, then 40- degrees below zero. Snow and ice coated them and their weapons. Sometimes the blizzard conditions made it impossible to see more than a few yards. Weapons and blood plasma froze. Medics carried morphine ampoules in their mouths to keep them warm. Trucks and jeeps had to be kept running constantly because it was almost impossible to get them started again.


 


From the hills and mountains surrounding the narrow roads, the Chinese rained machine gun fire and mortar shells on the Marines. Leatherneck battalions had to leapfrog each other as they moved south, fighting“yard by bitterly contested yard” to clear the heights commanding the road in front of them. Dedicated pilots from Marine Air Wings and Navy and Air Force units flew interdiction missions when the weather allowed. But for the most part, it was constant close quarter fighting–grenades, small arms and blades. The Marines won those fights.


 


At one point, the Marine advance halted. For a third time, the Chinese had destroyed a bridge over a gorge in the Funchlin Pass—this time, beyond repair. Air Force C-119’s parachuted eight bridge sections into the Marine perimeter. Six were recovered undamaged, allowing the Marines and an Army engineering unit to bridge the gorge.


 


Although the Chinese inflicted severe casualties, they could not break the Marine companies. As Max Hastings wrote in his history of the Korean War, “It is a tribute to the quality of units reconstituted only three months earlier, heavily manned by [Marine] reservists, that they mounted so dogged a defense under the most appalling conditions.”


 


Unlike many of the retreating American Army forces that wanted to simply abandon their heavy equipment and artillery, the Marines doggedly refused to leave anything behind. General Smith was adamant about conducting “an orderly and honorable withdrawal.” As they fought their way out of the mountains to the Korean coast, the Marines brought their equipment, their wounded, and their dead.


 


When they reached “Hellfire Valley” (between Hagau and Koto-ri), the situation looked impossible. Chesty Puller was unfazed. He climbed up on a ration box and told his men: “I don’t give a good goddamn how many Chinese laundrymen there are between us and Hungnam. There aren’t enough in the world to stop a Marine regiment going where it wants to go! Christ in His mercy will see us through.” Christ, the Marines’ raw courage and dogged determination, and their lead-from-the-front officers saw them through.


 


Puller later told reporters, “Remember when you write, this was no retreat. All that happened was we found more Chinese behind us than in front of us. So we about-faced and attacked.” The Marines and the US X Corps were able to reach the port city of Hungnam. They were evacuated by a 193 ship armada, which also took out 100,000 civilian Korean refugees.


 


The 1st Marine Division paid a heavy price: 4,418 battle casualties, including 718 dead and 192 missing. They suffered 7,313 non-battle casualties too, mostly cases of frostbite from the severe cold. But their valor and sacrifice saved the remnants of the American Army from what could have been one of its worst disasters.


 


So this Thanksgiving, let us remember the American warriors who went through hell 60 years ago to keep the forces of repression and totalitarianism at bay. We owe them a debt that neither we—nor the free peoples of South Korea—can ever repay.

Ohio Secretary of State to decide local election?

Ohio law gives the Secretary of State enormous power to decide local election issues. Outgoing Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner is one of the most partisan Secretaries of State in the nation. She has been willing to advance an agenda through her office whether it was forcing Cuyahoga County to use Spanish ballots countywide instead of the few areas they were actually needed, or, to interfere with removing ineligible voters from the rolls on the eve of the 2008 Presidential election. On the eve of her departure from office, Brunner will likely decide an election outcome.

In Cincinnati, a vacant juvenile court judge seat is up. At issue are 849 rejected provisional ballots. The Democrat Tracie Hunter trails by 23 votes. Ohio law requires voters to cast provisional ballots in their correct precinct. 284 of the 849 rejected provisional ballots were cast at the wrong precinct table. Hunter is arguing poll workers made a mistake by not sending those voters to the correct precinct table location. The federal court ordered Hamilton County to reexamine whether the provisional ballots should be counted.

This ruling is subject to appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Republicans on the Hamilton County board want to appeal. Democrats don’t. It is a tie.

Guess who gets to cast the deciding vote on whether to appeal the potentially incorrect decision? Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner. Rather than defend Ohio law which requires provisional ballots to be cast at the correct precinct, based on her past partisan plays, expect Brunner to vote not to appeal the federal court opinion. Cincinnati.com has
more .

Georgia voter fraud suspects surrender

Two women in eastern Georgia have turned themselves after charges were filed against them for felony voter fraud.  GPB news has more here.  Maybe someone should alert Tova Wang that she needs to amend her report on the absence of November 2010 voter fraud.

“The women were charged with three felony counts of mishandling absentee ballots, after a local postal worker tipped off authorities that one of them mailed a stack of ballots before the November 2nd general election.”

 

Virginia redistricting

An article in the Daily Press discusses the Virginia redistricting to take place in 2011.  As has been posted repeatedly at Election Law Center, states like Virginia should consider bypassing Department of Justice preclearance procedures and go straight to United States District Court in D.C., as they have the right to do under the Voting Rights Act.  On November 17, I asked Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli whether Virginia is considering doing so.  He told me that there have been discussions to that effect but for now it is not likely. 

I am hopeful that Virginia reconsiders.  There is no advantage to proceeding administratively with the Justice Department.  A submission will have to carry the same evidentiary burden before the Justice Department as they would before the District Court.  The materials would be the same.  The evidence would be the same.  The burdens would be the same.

What would be different?  The decision maker would be a neutral magistrate instead of a gang of bureaucrats who have demonstrated some questionable history in the past on redistricting plans. 

Also different would be the fact that established rules would govern the process.  The Rules of Civil Procedure would establish timetables, guidelines and decisions, not the whimsy of bureaucrats working in relative secrecy. 

Instead of private secret “informers” acting as witnesses opposing or supporting a plan through secret communications to the DOJ, evidence before the District Court would be in the open and subject to the Rules of Evidence and right to cross examination.

Costs?  That wouldn’t be much different either.  And what is more important, getting a fair hearing with a greater chance of a favorable outcome, or keeping costs down?  As recently as last August, the Wall Street Journal reported that he DOJ had gone beyond its authority in a Section 5 review of a Georgia law.  As reported by ELC
here, Georgia has wised up and has begun going straight to the United States District Court in D.C. to gain preclearance.  Other states like Virginia should follow suit.  They owe it to their taxpayers not to waste money on a less-fair administrative review when a more fair judicial review is available using the exact same evidence and burdens. 

The bottom like is that Virginia and all covered jurisdictions are more likely to have their plans approved, and more likely to have the original plan approved, if they bypass the Eric Holder Justice Department and instead go straight to court.  That means they bypass DOJ, period.