Link to Texas Motion to Dismiss the photo ID lawsuit. One must ask, do they even exist?
Author Archives: J Christian Adams
Planned Parenthood attacks voter ID in Texas
“Texas Asks U.S. Judge to Dismiss Photo ID Voter Lawsuit”
Businessweek reports: A federal judge should dismiss legal challenges to a Texas law requiring voters to show photo identification because the rule isn’t discriminatory and Texas has the right to set its own voter qualifications, state attorneys said in a court filing.
“Alabama makes plan for issuing free voter IDs”
“The secretary of state’s plan for implementing Alabama’s photo ID requirement for voting includes making free ID cards available at many locations throughout the state.” Clarion Ledger.
“Case Closed on TX Voter ID”
Amarillo-Globe News.
“The truth about civil rights & the Democrat Party”
“200-plus counties have more voters than residents”
Notice Sent to Virginia County Refusing to Remove Ineligible Voters
True the Vote has sent the notice required before litigation may commence under Section 8 of NVRA to the Chesterfield County registrar of voters for failing to remove ineligible voters under Virginia and Federal law. Washington Times has the story.
Target: At Large Water Districts
Now there is litigation against at-large water districts in California, proving once again the severe imbalance among the factions in election litigation. Water districts attract litigation but statewide failures to comply with list maintenance obligations do not.
“Latest voter fraud conviction makes case for voter ID”
Wisconsin Reporter. Look for the voter fraud deniers to move the goalposts. They’ll want voter ID to make a significant difference, or meaningful difference or alter the outcomes of elections. Of course it isn’t about altering outcomes. It’s about making sure not a single illegal vote is cast. “The court will agree this is the most serious of all election fraud” offenses Landgraf told Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Timothy Witkowiak on Thursday, as quoted by the Journal Sentinel. “Someone is seeking to dilute the vote of others … It goes against the fundamental principle of one person, one vote.” And here’s another point Landgraf raised at the sentencing, a point often overlooked in Wisconsin. “(I)t’s not difficult to in fact steal someone’s vote or vote twice,” the assistant D.A. said, according to the newspaper. He said the system “invests quite a bit of trust in the individual voter,” and Gigowski abused that trust.