PJ Rule of Law.

 PJ Rule of Law.

Most DOJ lawyers aren’t crooks.  Some are.  (Stay tuned for a big PJ Media story about more lawlessness inside DOJ when it comes to voting issues).  If you had any doubt that some inside DOJ are totally corrupt – and that Office of Professional Responsibility runs interference for them – read this court opinion from this week.

The long opinion relates to DOJ lawyer misconduct in the criminal case against New Orleans police officers arising out of Hurricane Katrina.  The case was brought by the US Attorney in New Orleans and the Civil Rights Division at DOJ. 

At page 33, the court makes clear what he thinks of the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility’s ability to handle DOJ lawyer misconduct.  The judge shares the opinion I expressed in this piece at PJ Media, “The Justice Department Fix is In,” involving to the OPR on the New Black Panther dismissal. 

Over the last few years, I have met numerous statewide and federal elected officials who fully understand that when they are dealing with the Eric Holder Justice Department, particularly the Civil Rights Division, they are not dealing with honest brokers – and sometimes outright rouges.  It seems members of the federal bench are also starting to get the message.

Of course you can read extensive details about more lawyer misconduct at DOJ, some of it costing millions of dollars in sanctions, in my book Injustice.

Most DOJ lawyers aren’t crooks.  Some are.  (Stay tuned for a big PJ Media story about more lawlessness inside DOJ when it comes to voting issues).  If you had any doubt that some inside DOJ are totally corrupt – and that Office of Professional Responsibility runs interference for them – read this court opinion from this week.

The long opinion relates to DOJ lawyer misconduct in the criminal case against New Orleans police officers arising out of Hurricane Katrina.  The case was brought by the US Attorney in New Orleans and the Civil Rights Division at DOJ. 

At page 33, the court makes clear what he thinks of the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility’s ability to handle DOJ lawyer misconduct.  The judge shares the opinion I expressed in this piece at PJ Media, “The Justice Department Fix is In,” involving to the OPR on the New Black Panther dismissal. 

Over the last few years, I have met numerous statewide and federal elected officials who fully understand that when they are dealing with the Eric Holder Justice Department, particularly the Civil Rights Division, they are not dealing with honest brokers – and sometimes outright rouges.  It seems members of the federal bench are also starting to get the message.

Of course you can read extensive details about more lawyer misconduct at DOJ, some of it costing millions of dollars in sanctions, in my book Injustice.

Apparently the election is no reason for Brentin Mock to stop his racially paranoid lunatic rants over at the barely read (see graph below) Colorlines.

I covered Mock’s Myths here at Breitbart.

Click the link quick before Main Justice goes out of business.  And can’t Mary Jacoby afford to give her “reporter(s)” a nice single lens reflex camera that takes photos that aren’t a blurry mess?

Injustice continues to sell well 14 months after release.  Why?  Because it makes a great Christmas present of course.  If you haven’t read it and want to learn about the rot and crime that affects American elections, and the paltry response of law enforcement, grab a copy today.  Link over there on the left, <——-

Way down the page you can see the sales tracker for 4 election-related books.  If you already read Injustice, you might check out Who’s Counting by Fund and von Spakovsky.

Truth is, right now, no one knows for the same reason nobody ever knows – social scientists spend most of their time denying it exists, fraud is hard to detect, and we are too close to the election to have found it. (Apart from Tova Wang, few have the ability to gauge voter fraud within 48 hours of an election).

One News Now has more.

Hans von Spakovsky has this op-ed in the USA Today writing against those who want to undo the Constitutional order involving state control of election (yes, they really exist) and give Washington D.C. the power to run our elections.

Arizona’s redistricting commission is telling a federal court that it’d be too much of a rush to schedule a late March trial on a lawsuit challenging the state’s new map of legislative districts.

A three-judge panel had said the case should go to trial by late March so it can be resolved in time to avoid disrupting the 2014 elections.

Link