“What Effect, If Any, Did Voter ID laws have on the Election”

The answer appears to be no.  This article at ProPublica.org looks at the new voter ID laws in New Hampshire, Tennessee, and Virginia and whether there was any impact on turnout and the administration of the election.  The statistics show there were little to no impact on either. In Pennsylvania, while the voter ID law was not in full effect, statistics may be gleaned because of the requests for voter ID.

Some examples:  Out of 2.74 million voters in Tennessee, only 674 failed to bring in photo ID.
In Virginia, there were only 543 voter ID provisional ballots statewide out of 3.6 million voters.  In New Hampshire, less than 1% and probably much lower filled out voter affidavits in lieu of a photo ID.

Local election officials rebut the radical idea of nationalization of elections

Long lines? Yes, but not the first time for the Republic. Do improvements need to be made to reduce the lines?  Yes.  However, individuals with no experience in the actual running of elections want to nationalize our nation’s elections. 

While the federalization of all elections may be easy political rhetoric, local election officials do not believe that putting the federal government in control of our elections process is a prudent course of action.  The representative of the National Association of Election Officials explained why he believes it is pure folly:

Having the federal governmenthere.

“Fairbanks (Alaska) lawyers accuses board of racial gerrymandering”

Election results show that a new House district supposedly drawn to
preserve Native voting power in the Interior was actually a gerrymander
that shifted Democrats out of Fairbanks and diluted the Native vote, a
complaint to the Alaska Supreme CourtMore here.

Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/11/13/2691904/fairbanks-lawyer-accuses-board.html#storylink=cpy