Link to Wall Street Journal.

Obama and the party of campaign finance control raise 181 million in one month and approaches 1 billion dollars in campaign funds as they flood the airwaves in battleground states.

The Nielsen Co. said last week that Obama’s campaign had run nearly
230,000 ads in nine battleground states from the beginning of the year
through early September, compared with about 87,000 for Romney.

And its tied.

The New York Times in its editorial “Impartial Justice at Risk” doesn’t want the Florida public to have any say or input on the selection or retention of judges.  No, they simply want the citizens of Florida to shut their mouth and give essentially life-time appointments to judges despite their judicial actions.  Just as with campaign finance, the New York Times is just fine with less democracy and free speech and they will defend justices who use their ideology in interpreting the law…. as long as it is a liberal ideology.

With its activism and lack of impartiality, the Florida Supreme Court has already created a perception among Florida legislators and citizens that the dominant left wing of the court does not give conservative philosophy a fair and objective review and too eager to strike down any law not in line with their personal political philosophy.  There is a significant belief that the Court has become way too politicized, substituting their liberal judgment for that of conservative legislation and governance.  The elite in Florida can deny it or ignore it, but in this country if something is politicized the only legal way to change it is through political change and the ballot box.  In this instance, average citizens have only been provided a small morsel of democracy where the public can only retain or not retain a justice.  The people should exercise that right and then seek more.

The saga continues in Massachusetts.  Despite mounting evidence of a failure, Secretary of the State William Galvin still maintains the concerns are a “political stunt.”  Actually, the facts may eventually show that Galvin may be the one pulling the wool over people’s eyes with the denial of simple facts on the timing of ballot mailings at the expense of valid military and overseas civilian voters.  Has he lawyered up or is he simply in that politician denial mode. Ironically, according to Wikipedia, the Secretary of the Commonwealth is the principle public information officer of Massachusetts. In the spirit of informing the public, there should be a press conference immediately to dispel any more rumors and put all the facts on the table.

excerpt: Incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is
threatening legal action against Secretary of State William Galvin if he
discovers the state isn’t complying with a federal law that mandates
that the voting rights of all military personnel serving overseas are
met.

That deadline fell on Sept. 22, a Saturday,
meaning Galvin’s office was required by law to deliver the ballots to
all of the state’s 351 town and city clerks by the end of the day. A survey This entry was posted in Uncategorized on October 7, 2012 by J Christian Adams.