Details here.
True the Vote Colorado Summit – August 18
Details here.
“Another Justice Lie: Caught Again”
Pittsburgh Tribune Review on the truthfulness of AAG Tom Perez.
“Another Justice Lie: Caught Again”
Pittsburgh Tribune Review on the truthfulness of AAG Tom Perez.
O’Reilly Factor on the Veracity of AAG Tom Perez
Link to video of Bill O’Reilly discussing possible perjury of AAG Tom Perez is here.
O’Reilly Factor on the Veracity of AAG Tom Perez
Link to video of Bill O’Reilly discussing possible perjury of AAG Tom Perez is here.
15 military groups opposing Obama campaign lawsuit
Gatewaypundit.com. According to the Obama campaign and Colonel Axelrod, Romney and the 15 military groups have no idea what they are talking about.
15 military groups opposing Obama campaign lawsuit
Gatewaypundit.com. According to the Obama campaign and Colonel Axelrod, Romney and the 15 military groups have no idea what they are talking about.
“Getting It Wrong on Voter ID”
In the Politico article, Emily Schultheis repeats the left-wing, anti-voter ID Brennan Center’s claim that “at least 5 million voters could be affected by” new voter-ID laws, but von Spakovsky’s research reveals “that 5 million figure is completely speculative and not based on any substantive evidence.” “Schultheis also says, as if it is a proven fact, that these ‘laws tend to disproportionately affect young voters and minorities.’ Really? Based on what evidence? The actual turnout of Democratic and minority voters went up, not down, in Georgia and Indiana after their voter-ID laws went into effect.”
Calling out yet another of the “many poorly researched articles written about voter-ID laws,” Hans von Spakovsky notes “there is no evidence to support the claim, as expressed in the title of the article, that ‘Voter ID Laws Could Swing States’ — unless what is meant is that these laws could prevent the casting of fraudulent votes that could steal an election.”
“Getting It Wrong on Voter ID”
In the Politico article, Emily Schultheis repeats the left-wing, anti-voter ID Brennan Center’s claim that “at least 5 million voters could be affected by” new voter-ID laws, but von Spakovsky’s research reveals “that 5 million figure is completely speculative and not based on any substantive evidence.” “Schultheis also says, as if it is a proven fact, that these ‘laws tend to disproportionately affect young voters and minorities.’ Really? Based on what evidence? The actual turnout of Democratic and minority voters went up, not down, in Georgia and Indiana after their voter-ID laws went into effect.”
Calling out yet another of the “many poorly researched articles written about voter-ID laws,” Hans von Spakovsky notes “there is no evidence to support the claim, as expressed in the title of the article, that ‘Voter ID Laws Could Swing States’ — unless what is meant is that these laws could prevent the casting of fraudulent votes that could steal an election.”