Hundreds of thousands of Wisconsin voters may or may not have to show a
valid photo I-D in order to vote a week from tomorrow. It all depends on
what a three-judge panel does or doesn’t do between now and Election
Day. link
“Effort to repeal voter ID law fails in Tenn Senate”
Link. State Elections Coordinator Mark Goins said he favors the new law
because it does provide a tool that wasn’t there before to more
thoroughly identify the person seeking to vote.
Fox and Friends this morning – 745
I will be on Fox and Friends at 745 EDT to talk about the New Black Panthers and the Justice Department.
Citizen Group Offering $5,000 Reward for Reporting Voter Fraud: In South Texas, Illegal Vote Harvesting By “Politiqueras” a Persistent Problem
Will a cash reward induce South Texas citizens to report the voter fraud that is entrenched in their communities, and succeed where weak laws and penalties, and lax enforcement, have failed in deterring illegal vote harvesting? According to Citizens Against Voter Abuse (CAVA) President, Mary Helen Flores: “The pattern is for the politiqueras, which is a person paid by candidates, to go and specifically take votes from people, the mail in votes, they go and they pick up the mail in ballots from people who live in assisted living centers, the nursing homes. They take their ballots, fill them out for them and then mail it and those votes are not valid votes, they’re stealing votes and so it ruins the authenticity of all our elections,” says Flores. The watchdog group is asking residents to stand up and help put a stop to this illegal activity… A member of the group has put up a $5,000 reward for the arrest and conviction of any person committing voter fraud here in our county. “There is a lack of enforcement, a lack of redress from the state level on down with regards to how the mail in system works,” says Flores. CAVA isn’t the only group concerned with mail-in ballot fraud. Investigative journalists at Texas Watchdog have reported extensively on the persistent problem of vote harvesting, including a Dec 2010 story of politiquera Dora Gonzalez who confessed to illegally harvesting 100+ ballots on behalf of a Val Verde County Commissioner in the March 2010 Democrat primary. A judge ordered a new election, but Gonzalez wasn’t charged. Most perpetrators aren’t, as prosecutors say “the penalties are so small they don’t deter the crime.” TW also interviewed politiquera Zaida Bueno about her vote harvesting activities, for which she and two others received “a year of probation, a 180-day suspended jail sentence, a $200 fine and 40 hours of community work.” Bueno claimed she didn’t know vote harvesting was illegal. “After all, it was the candidates themselves who were giving her the instructions, she said.” Along with minimal risk of punishment is the potential for big rewards. Starr County election administrator Rafael Montalvo testified to the state legislature’s Elections Committee in 2008 that sometimes politiqueras receive $10 per voter and can make good money during an election period – as much as $30,000 a season, by some estimates. So will the threat of reward-motivated informing to authorities deter these professional fraudsters? What about legislative action to deter mail-in ballot fraud? Again via TW, “Without a doubt we have a problem,” said state rep. Aaron Pena, whose district includes most of Hidalgo County in South Texas. Over his four victorious campaigns, he’s been approached by vote harvesters, or politiqueros, with promises of vote delivery. When he refused, he said he was told he was courting ‘political trouble’ and making himself a target.” But so far most Texas legislators have been hesitant to propose substantive changes to secure mail-in balloting. Perhaps in its next session, Texas will consider the recommendations of the American Civil Rights Union’s “Protect Your Vote!” project, as already implemented in Kansas’ SAFE Act, and pass legislation requiring signature verification and an acceptable proof of ID when voting by mail – just as soon as they finish litigating their in-person photo Voter ID law.
Nebraska Governor: “ID requirement wouldn’t impede voting”
Gov. Dave Heineman signaled Monday that he would likely support
legislation requiring Nebraska voters to show government-issued photo
identifications before they cast a ballot. Link.
Speaking of Black Panthers . . .
NPR.
Hat tip to CA who wrote with the story and said “shouldn’t they be following the law rather than their conscience?” For more on that angle, don’t miss National Review’s post yesterday about what happens when attorneys in the Civil Rights Division follow their conscience instead of the law. The results are embarrassing for all involved.
“How Many Crimes Did the New Black Pathers Commit in Florida?”
PJ Rule of Law: “Now Florida officials may have a chance to do what Eric Holder refused to do — bring these New Black Panther gangsters to justice once and for all. . . . The New Black Panthers act like they are above the law because so far they have been. Americans are taking renewed notice of the New Black Panthers and the politicians who have enabled them. What sort of country have we become that racist uniformed thugs can stalk polls and threaten free citizens with mob arrest and murder? Is this a post-racial America, or a wicked reminder of a lawless age we thought we had moved beyond forever? So what crimes may have the New Black Panthers committed in Florida with their threats toward George Zimmerman? Let’s start with solicitation to kidnap.”
Injustice on WJR-AM Detroit Tuesday 10am
I will be on the 50,000 watt blowtorch, Detroit’s talker, WJR-AM in the 10 a.m. hour with a broadcasting institution, Frank Beckmann, to talk about Eric Holder and the lawlessness being advocated by the New Black Panther party. The signal of this class A clear channel station is staggering, from the U.P. to Dayton, from almost to Buffalo to South Bend.
Nebraska Voter ID moves forward with Governor Heineman (and not AG Bruning) leading the charge
The big photo ID debate is set to finally resume in Nebraska. And Governor Dave Heineman says publicly that photo ID laws are not an impediment to vote and are a step in the right direction. Republican Don Stenberg has come out in favor of the voter ID bill because it is going to be a big fight as Democrats try to filbuster.
Of course, there is nary a word from Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, who urged the U.S. Senate in writing to confirm U.S. Attorney General Holder and Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Thomas Perez into their powerful positions within the Obama Administration.
The endorsements showed extremely poor judgement as both appointees turned out to be leading opponents of photo ID legislation across country.
While Politico says Jon Bruning was a liberal in law school who maintained a variety of liberal views, they don’t appear to include anything on Photo ID. So I am going to set my watch and see how long it takes for Bruning to come out in favor of photo ID in Nebraska.
Ready, set…..Go!!
Thanks for 2nd Rush Shoutout in a Week
Once again, Rush Limbaugh shouts out, and posts Injustice at his website. Rush:
“Well, not everybody, but the people making hay out of this are inflaming it and making it bigger — I mean, from the White House on down — rather than try to cool this thing off and slow it down and wait ’til we found out exactly what happened here.
But a $10,000 bounty. And the New Black Panther Party, don’t forget, is the group that intimidated voters in 2008 in Philadelphia and a number of other places, and lawsuits were filed against them for voter intimidation and the Obama Justice Department (the attorney general, Eric Holder) just threw the investigation out. He just brought it to screeching halt.”