Voter Fraud and Payback Time

Robert Knight has a piece at the Washington Times that runs rough over voter fraudsters.


“Richardson was previously convicted of threatening to kill a witness in a criminal case against her brother; of stealing; of drunken driving; and of beating someone in a bar fight,” The Cincinnati Enquirer reported. When sentenced for vote fraud, she was unbowed, claiming to be a victim of racism.

Assistant prosecutor Bill Anderson, however, saw it differently: “[She] is an ideologue who was hell-bent on stuffing the ballot box with as many Obama votes as possible.”

So, you have a problem with that? The Rev. Al Sharpton doesn’t. He and Ohio Democrats hailed Ms. Richardson at a March 20 rally in Cincinnati following her release after serving eight months of her five-year term for voter fraud.

“There is a growing toxic movement in some corners of the country that are perfectly willing to accept criminal acts in the election and furtherance of a broader progressive agenda,” former Justice Department Voting Section attorney J. Christian Adams said during a March 25 interview on “The Steve Malzberg Show” on Newsmax TV.

“There is this corrupt attitude that is beginning to gain total acceptance in some corners of government and academia, that accepts criminality in American elections in the name of payback time.”

Mr. Adams was among Justice Department staff during the Bush administration who investigated vote fraud and intimidation in Mississippi, where the white power structure oppressed black citizens for decades, followed by corrupt, racist black political machines.

In his book “Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department,” Mr. Adams recalls Democratic operatives in Noxubee County who “visited black voters who had requested absentee ballots on the day the ballot arrived in the mail. Sometimes the operatives snatched the ballot out of the mailbox before the voter knew it arrived. Other times, ballots were sent to black residents who hadn’t even requested them .” At the polls, “assistors” hounded people, telling them how to vote.

Last fall, Mr. Adams and his former Voting Section boss, Christopher Coates, won two consent decrees on behalf of the American Civil Rights Union from two Mississippi counties — Walthall and Jefferson Davis — in the first privately filed lawsuits under the National Voter Registration Act. The counties, which have more registered voters than eligible residents, agreed to clean up their rolls. The American Civil Rights Union has since filed similar suits in two Texas counties — Terrell and Zavala.


Read more: www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/28/knight-vote-fraud-as-payback-time/#ixzz2xJiTRk3C
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Texas Voting Machine Controversy Heads to Grand Jury

Breitbart Texas.  “most of the candidates’ complaints regarding voting machines were largely unspecific. One letter, however, claimed “individual voters have indicated that in casting their vote using Hidalgo County’s voting machines, their vote for a particular candidate was changed by the voting machine; this happened repeatedly throughout the county.”

“Others have complained that the total votes reported by the machines exceeded the total of voters that actually voted,” a complaint letter obtained by Breitbart Texas said.”

NIU Law Fed Soc Debate

Congratulations to the Northern Illinois School of Law Federalist Society Chapter for the most creative promotional piece for any of my law school speeches.  This will be my 44th address at a law school and hands down the best poster.  The event is April 10 in the evening. Details to follow.



Senator Leland Yee: Gunrunner and Speech Regulator

A hero of the speech regulation crowd has been revealed as a gun runner, trafficker and indicted Senator.  California Democrat Leland Yee was charged with multiple federal counts of gun running, trafficking and corruption.  Yee was a champion of the speech regulators in California and opponent of Citizens United.  One sample:


Two new bills propose ways to give voters greater insights into the flood of political money from often obscure nonprofit organizations. SB 3, by Sens. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, and Ted Lieu, D-Torrance, would require nonprofit groups that donate $100,000 or more in a year to political campaigns to identify the source of that funding. AB 45, by Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, would require politically active nonprofit organizations to disclose donors who in the six months before an election have contributed at least $50,000.


The bill would also give the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission greater power to go to court to compel such groups to reveal donors.

Sensenbrenner’s Friends: “Federal intervention is needed to ensure Wisconsin voting rights”

The Wisconsin Journal Sentinel columnists don’t like Republican voter ID and other voting reforms and demand federal intervention blocking of integrity laws.  To Sensenbrenner’s Friends, Jim Crow has come to Wisconsin.  
Voters here need Federal protection from Jim Crow-style ballot-box barriers because The Vote in Wisconsin has been willfully compromised.
Sounds eerily familiar. Wisconsin Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, who says he is for voter ID, now favors federal intervention into Wisconsin elections, veto power over Wisconsin integrity laws and the ability of the federal government to send observers to any polling place in Wisconsin upon the request of a complaining group.  Sensenbrenner’s continued alliance with left wing groups and ACLU lobbyists will result in new and increased federal veto power over Wisconsin’s and other state’s voting laws. Sensenbrenner wants to give that power to activists like Attorney General Holder and friends who attack Governor Walker and the Wisconsin legislature daily over voter integrity laws. Sensenbrenner’s Friends.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner wins the Aretha Franklin Award for “Hat at Inaugural Ceremony.” Congratulations, congressman!
Photo via this amazing New York Times interactive.

“Lessons from the Voter ID Experience in Tennessee”

Heritage continues to review evidence from states implementing voter ID.   

The latest data from Tennessee about the state’s experience with its new photographic voter identification law show that this requirement has done nothing to suppress voter turnout throughout the state. In fact, overall turnout in Tennessee was slightly higher, and black voters turned out at higher rates than white voters in the first election held after the law became effective.  The claims made by voter ID opponents that the law would prevent minorities and other Tennesseans from being able to vote have been shown to be untrue.

Multiple courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court and the Tennessee Supreme Court, have found voter ID laws constitutional and not a burden on voters. As the Tennessee legislature concluded, voter ID is simply a common-sense reform that is needed to protect the security of elections. The goals of voter ID are simple: to fight against voter fraud, to maintain public confidence in the democratic process, and to ensure the legitimacy of elections in America.