Bob Filner, the pervert progressive mayor of San Diego, (“let me
"http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/07/15/Sources-Mayor-Filner-Grabbed-Breasts-A-Shoved-Tongue-Down-Her-Throat" target="">stick my tongue down your throat; please
"http://jezebel.com/san-diego-mayor-allegedly-told-staffer-to-not-wear-pan-919558952" target="">don’t wear underwear to the office.”) is
"http://www.ontheissues.org/CA/Bob_Filner_Government_Reform.htm" target="">also another California speech regulator. Filner supports forced government speech through government funding of
political campaigns, and a variety of other familiar free speech regulations.
![]()
"BORDER-TOP: 0px solid; HEIGHT: 230px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 0px solid; WIDTH: 373px" src=
"http://images.quickblogcast.com/2/4/3/2/5/261625-252342/pervert.JPG?a=96" width="498" height="394">
The pervert progressive Mayor also supported a variety of limits on campaign speech limits which was the
"http://www.cityethics.org/content/important-local-campaign-finance-decision-san-diego" target="">subject of litigation brought by the Republican Party. The “Director of Research, City
Ethics” (Robert Wechsler holds this absurdly titled taxpayer funded position) opined that the suit to
defend the First Amendment might be plain old harassment.
“the suit seems to be more promotion and harassment than an attempt to change the law. Would the plaintiffs prefer a public campaign financing program in San Diego?”
The comments demonstrate the arrogance of many in the speech regulation universe, so convinced of the rightness of their position, they don’t take anyone seriously who disagrees with them. They must
certainly be right. They must certainly be better qualified to decide who may talk and who may not. They don’t appreciate disagreement with efforts to regulate speech. Diversity of opinion, to
them, consists of people with different last names offering the same opinion. Efforts to fund a vibrant debate are met with threats of criminal prosecution.
That’s what thugs throughout history have done – devise ways to threaten people with whom they disagree by crafting laws facially benign but ultimately malignant. People like Filner oppose freedom
and individual liberty and concoct schemes to take away that freedom of speech and sell it as something desirable.
They fear vibrant debate more than they fear the government, despite the lessons of history.
We’ve seen perverts like …