Iowa voter fraud charges have been filed.  A Nevada lawyer is representing the Iowa defendant and has bizarre comments:

“A Melbourne man has been charged with election misconduct in a case his attorney says proves the Iowa voting system works without the need for the criminal investigations launched by Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz last year.”

The lawyer is saying that the charges against his client proves that the power to investigate voter fraud in Iowa should not be expanded?  Why would a criminal defense attorney wade into that policy debate?