Proponents of the push to require photo ID and make
other polling place changes asked the court Thursday to undo revisions
by Secretary of State Mark Ritchie. The Democrat cast aside the title
legislators chose to appear above the ballot question in favor of his
own. A tussle over the title for a proposed constitutional amendment seeking changes to Minnesota voting is headed for the state Supreme Court. link here.
The Minnesota Legislature passed the ballot question with the title
“Photo Identification Required for Voting.” Ritchie changed the title to “Changes to in-person & absentee voting &
voter registration; provisional ballots.” Ritchie bares his partisan teeth and shows himself not to be a steward of
fair election administration in his state. Instead, his actions are one
you would expect of a partisan ideologue trying to inappropriately
influence the votes of Minnesota citizens. If you were to strap Secretary Ritchie to a lie detector and ask him whether he
thought his proposed title fairly describes the Photo ID amendment that has been debated over the past year, he
would likely fail. Where are all the critics of partisan election administration?
why doesn’t your website have a phone contact so that anyone with vote fraud info or evidence could discuss it with your staff? I’ve spent 10 years fighting voting fraud in Nevada and computer voting security and would like to share it and help prevent it.
You have my email, please reply.
Tom Stown
Why doesn’t the website have a phone so anyone with info on vote fraud can discuss it? A couple of reasons. 1) No time to take incoming calls to chat about voter fraud. 2) You can post commments here. 3) Not intersted in computer voter security. Comupter security is better than paper ballot human security. If you are in Nevada, hope you volunteered with True the Vote.