Behold vote fraud denier Rick Ungar at Forbes.  He attacks John Fund in Forbes for pointing out that Meloweese Richardson admitted voting twice in Ohio for President Obama.  His outrage is premised on the presumption of innocence, and since Meloweese Richardson hasn’t been convicted of anything, we can’t refer to her as a vote fraudster.  About that double vote she made, voting absentee then in person? Ungar says she was confused.

What Ungar doesn’t tell readers of Forbes is that Richardson also admitted voting for THREE OTHER PEOPLE twice, including her brother and daughter.

This is how vote fraud deniers work:
1) attack anyone who points out criminality in elections.  Ungar calls Fund’s piece a “hit piece.”
2) Give the criminal the benefit of the doubt.
3) Accuse those who speak of the criminality of trying to “disenfranchise” voters. 

It is a well worn and familiar template, and one that no longer works when someone as brazen as Richardson speaks to the camera about her crimes.

But alas, one suspects Ungar never saw the video.  The National Review piece embedded the video, but if Ungar is being intellectually honest, he must not have taken the time to watch it.  Or, he isn’t being intellectually honest.  Either option doesn’t speak well of the quality of writing at Forbes.