The Lou Dobbs interview is Monday instead.   I will try to post the Monday schedule later once it is finalized.

I’ll be on the Lou Dobbs show nationwide Friday talking about my latest Pajamas Media piece as well as the Voting Section’s unwillingness to object to a submission of Ike Brown in Noxubee County Mississippi and use Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to protect a discriminated against minority there.  I will also be on the radio in New York City and surrounding area on the Chris DeBello show on WSUS-FM, WNNJ-FM, WHCY-FM, and WTOC-AM.  Again, the topic will be the DOJ Voting Section’s unwillingness to use Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to protect all Americans from racial discrimination.   And lastly I will be on live all over the state of Texas in the 10 a.m. hour (CDT).  You can find the show at KVCE in Dallas, KSEV in Houston, KTEM Ft. Hood, KCRS Midland, KBRA Freer, KBW Waco and KWBC Navasota.  I’ll also be talking about the Black Panther case and equal enforcement of the law.

It is nice to see the Friday Washington Times use the term “racialist” instead of the inapplicable “racist” in discussing my latest Pajamas Media article.

(With apologies to subscribers, and UPDATE):  This sentence of the Washington Times piece seemed noteworthy: “And when The Washington Time asked directly on Monday about the Fernandes statement, Justice spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler  responded with boilerplate that neither affirmed nor denied the statement.”

And under oath. Links to sworn affidavits below.  And these affidavits are just the beginning.

Butch Bowers :  “In my experience, there was a pervasive culture in the Civil Rights Division and within the Voting Section of apathy, and in some cases outright hostility, towards race-neutral enforcement of voting-rights laws among large segments of career attorneys.”

Von Spakovsky:  Numerous facts sworn to under oath- Coates harassed, Joe Rich misrepresented the Ike Brown J Memo recommendation, Joe Rich was disciplined for the misrepresentation, open disgust about investigating Noxubee County case by some, other employees harassed who worked on cases against black defendants, hostility toward enforcing Section 8 of Motor Voter to remove dead people from rolls, and more.

The Department is not allowing Christopher Coates to comply with his subpoena.  These two affidavits give you an abbreviated understanding about why that is.  If he were permitted to appear and tell the truth, the lid blows off.   As I said in my testimony, it is difficult to deny the truth when so many good honest people know the truth.

Four felony counts reported in Oklahoma:

“The Adair County District Attorney’s office filed felony charges against Adair County resident Darryl Cates. Cates, 73, of Westville, Okla. had four counts brought against him July 13^th in the District Court of the 15^th Judicial District of Oklahoma: two were for false affidavit in voting registration and two for false notarization of absentee ballot. This was signed off by Assistant District Attorney Larry Langley. The crime Cates is accused of is punishable by imprisonment for up to 2 years and a fine up to $5,000.”

I received an email from a reader of ElectionLawCenter.com noting that Tim Reid, the actor who has played Venus Flytrap on WKRP in Cincinnati may be a New Black Panther.

I don’t know the answer.  One thing is for sure, the head of the New Black Panther Party, Malik Zulu Shabazz, organized a “National Black Power Conference”  complete with plenty of participants such as noted anti-Semite Leonard Jeffries, stacks of New Black Panther Members such as Divine Allah and Queen Sheena Sheba Africa. Reid was a speaker also.  I don’t know if Venus has a uniform and is a member, but his appearance at this sort of event comes as a surprise

Sorry for the late notice again.  I was already on WFLA in Tallahassee and WSBA in eastern PA talking about my latest piece at Pajamas Media.   At 11 EDT I’ll be on nationwide on the American Family Network radio and later on KLZ in Denver on the Jim Pfaff show.  I’ll try to post additional bookings today as they become available.

John Fund has this at the Wall Street Journal.  Felons for Franken.

Could this be possible?!?: “Academic work by Jeff Manza and Marcus Britton of Northwestern University and Christopher Uggen of the University of Minnesota has shown that a large majority of felons routinely vote Democratic. The two academics estimated that Bill Clinton pulled 86% of the felon vote in 1992 and 93% in 1996. Statistician John Lott’s own work in Washington State found that felons were 37% more likely to be registered Democrats even when accounting for race, gender, education level, religious habits, employment, age, and county of residence.”

I previously wrote  at Pajamas Media how this week we would get some clarity whether or not Eric Holder is willing to use Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to protect all Americans from discrimination, or just some.  The Department had a chance to redeem itself and enforce provisions of Section 5 in a racially fair manner by objecting to a Section 5 submission by proven race discriminator Ike Brown.    Instead, it issued a no determination letter , and then tried to hide it from the media for over 40 hours.  Members of the media sought to obtain the “no determination” letter from the Justice Department but the Department would not turn over the public document.  So much for transparency that we heard so much about.

Then, on July 13, the Department filed a motion to expand the remedy in the US v. Ike Brown case.  Note that the prior administration had brought the case and obtained the remedy. 

My latest Pajamas Media piece deals with the whole sordid affair of the last two days and the continued unwillingness of the DOJ to enforce Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in a race neutral fashion.  I will be on a variety of radio and television stations across the country Wednesday and Thursday talking about this cop-out and the DOJ’s unwillingness to use Section 5 to protect all Americans.

Ike Brown made his Section 5 request to allow him to prevent people to vote way back on May 12, 2010.  It was not until July 1, over 4 days after my first piece in Pajamas Media appeared, before the Justice Department even contacted a single victim in Noxubee County about this matter.  I know because I have spoken with them throughout this entire affair.

Some excerpts from my latest at Pajamas Media:

“Sadly, the Department did not object to the submission and therefore refused to protect the white minority in Noxubee County in the least costly, most powerful way possible — a simple letter objecting to the proposal. Why? Because it is high heresy to include discriminated-against whites within the protections of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. This attitude is common knowledge within the voting section.

Amazingly, the Department is also seeking an order from the federal court to prevent Ike Brown, the discriminator, from making any more inconvenient submissions to the Obama Justice Department which might reveal the hostility toward equal enforcement of the law. Simply put, they are asking the court to prohibit Brown from sending any more submissions under Section 5.  Not only would this go beyond the powers of the court to order, it is a naked play to avoid facing the issue of unequal enforcement for the remainder of the first, and maybe last, term of the Obama administration. If Brown can’t file submissions to the DOJ, the DOJ won’t have to take the side of the white victims. This is unnecessary and shamefully transparent.”

It can be very discouraging to fair minded folks to hear some of the outlandish things people are willing to say in this media environment, where accountability and shame seem to be passé, some relic from an America era where common experience bound us together.  I will group in this category the claim that various government officials are “racist,” as I attempted to explain in a recent Pajamas Media piece I do not believe to be true.  Refusing to enforce the law in a race neutral fashion is not necessarily racist, though I can see why it is attractive to reject my argument.

At the same time, it is unfortunate to hear similarly unhinged arguments from others – like unsupported attacks (incidentally lobbed by a former DOJ voting official who himself was the subject of a racial discrimination complaint against him – but I will devote a future article to that later) and the terrifying development that one’s veracity can be judged by where they fall on the political or ideological spectrum.  Those of us who have read the Nobel Prize winning Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn recognize this disturbing psychological tactic.

“Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence. Any man who has once proclaimed violence as his method is inevitably forced to take the lie as his principle,” he notes.

Truth exists apart from political views, identity and race.  But I recognize much of the intellectual history of the west over the last 50 years has sought to eradicate this philosophy, but again, an article for another day.

Hans von Spakovsky has this article at National Review about the New Black Panther case.  The Lie du Jour among many on July 12 was that somehow the Bush administration was to blame (the record keeps skipping Hazel) for not bringing criminal charges against the New Black Panthers.  Among many other points, Spakovsky notes:

“Yet … the Obama administration could make the decision today to indict the members of the New Black Panther Party, since they are still well within the applicable criminal statute of limitations. But you can rest assured that they will not do so. It is more important to them to block the investigation of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and to creatively excuse what they have done in this case, which was throw away the opportunity to obtain an exhaustive and wide-ranging permanent injunction against the NBPP in the civil case, which would have ensured that what happened in Philadelphia in November of 2008 never happened again at any polling place anywhere in the country.”