The GBI has its hands full. GPB has more.
Last chance to be heard on protecting military voting rights
Monday is the deadline for Pentagon decisions on the 12 jurisdictions seeking to escape the new protections for military voters. The federal law mandates all ballots be sent 45 days in advance of the election. These states failed to fix their laws and instead are asking to avoid new protections. It is this simple: the grant of a waiver means that some servicemembers will not have their votes count. No electronic internet remedy can help the teeth, even though it might help the tail. There is still time for citizens to exercise their First Amendment right of petition and let the bureaucrats in charge of the decision know you don’t want any waivers granted. The states are:
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
New York
Delaware
Maryland
D.C.
Wisconsin
Colorado
Alaska
Hawaii
Washington
Virgin Islands
The final few paragraphs of my latest Pajamas Media article tells you how you can petition for denials of waiver requests. You can also demand that all guidance from DOJ and the waiver requests be made public:
“Maryland found time for designating September 15 through October 15 as ‘Hispanic Heritage Month,’ a ban on driving with cell phones, mandatory solar energy purchases for state utilities, a law to decrease how far away from shore people can hunt ducks … and saddest of all, a law allowing 16-year-olds to register to vote. Obviously Maryland has other priorities besides men and women serving overseas.
In the meantime, the public, particularly military families and veterans groups, have a right to petition their government and voice their opinion about the waivers. Citizens can reach FVAP and tell them to deny all waiver requests at 800-438-8683 or vote@fvap.gov. Citizens can petition the DOJ and tell them both to recommend against granting the waivers and to sue states who submitted them at (202) 307-2767 or rebecca.j.wertz@usdoj.gov.
Citizens have this right in a free and democratic government. Whether or not Washington cares enough to listen remains to be seen.”
Fox: Three part series on military voting
Fox is doing a three part series on the MOVE Act and the waiver requests from 12 jurisdictions seeking to avoid complying with the new MOVE Act. The decision whether or not to grant the waivers is due on Monday. Meanwhile, Senator John Cornyn’s hold on Deputy Attorney General nominee James Cole is firmly still in place, and will likely get firmer if many waiver applications are granted on Monday, or, if DOJ doesn’t release publicly its guidance to the Pentagon regarding the 12 waiver requests. I’m sure the most transparent adminstration in history will have the waiver guidance on their website by COB Monday.
The second part of the series will air Thursday at 6 p.m.
Judge refuses to dismiss Atlantic City (NJ) voter fraud charges

A judge has refused to dismiss voter fraud charges against some of the 12 charged with tampering with absentee ballots in the 2009 Atlantic City (NJ) mayor’s race. The Press of Atlantic City has more.
“In October, Ronald Harris, 24, of Atlantic City, admitted he and others conspired to submit false documents involving messenger ballots in the primary. Harris, a registered Democrat, later told a reporter he only pleaded guilty out of fear.
Earlier this month, Ernest Storr, 44, not only admitted to breaking election laws during Small’s campaign, but said he did the same thing while helping then-Mayor Scott Evans in his unsuccessful bid in 2008. Although both campaigns were for Democrats, Storr is a registered Republican, according to voter records.
The 12 remaining defendants have until Monday to decide whether to take a plea deal or go to trial. Jury selection is set for Oct. 4.”
53,345 hits on Virginia State Board of Elections
Election Law Center has received 53,345 unique hits on our coverage of the mess at the Virginia State Board of Elections alone. Obviously it is a story many care about. It is a story people from around the Commonwealth are paying close attention to, even if their counterparts in the dying dead trees media are ignoring it. (Including the Richmond Times and Virginia Pilot).
The story isn’t going to go away either. We have obtained documents, internal emails, which show a variety of questionable activities by certain SBE employees during the 2008 Presidential election. In general, these documents call into question the neutrality of certain employees during that election as it affected SBE policy. They create a reasonable inference that the Virginia SBE was taking steps to aid a particular national campaign. We have the actual internal emails and will post them in the future.
Partisanship isn’t the only lingering issue at the Virginia SBE. More stories are to come regarding contract irregularities and a variety of other management issues involving waste, fraud and abuse. Thanks to all of the present and former employees at the Virginia State Board of Elections who have provided internal documents, memos, budgets, RFP’s and most of all, firsthand accounts of the unresolved mess that is the Virginia SBE to Election Law Center.com.
We also have documents demonstrating the hostility of the Virginia SBE to the rights of our men and women serving overseas, our military voters. Simply put, the Virginia SBE under Nancy Rodrigues took disgraceful legal positions in cases other than the disgraceful position it took in McCain v. Cunningham. These disgraceful legal positions sought to and would have the effect of tossing out the votes of soldiers serving overseas. Given that so many Virginians put their lives on the line for us all, they have the right to expect more from the Virginia SBE.
Stay tuned.
More on the mess at the Virginia SBE
Examiner.com has more .
Robeson County (NC) voter fraud indictment
Allegations are that a candidate cast two votes. More here from the Fayetteville Observer.
King Street Patriots (TX) question thousands of Houston registrations
Full story here.
Photo of vacant lot where six “voters” lived.
Full story: Today, the King Street Patriots, a group of citizen-volunteers in Harris County, Texas, announced their discovery of thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of incomplete, inaccurate or false voter registrations. The group, represented by Liberty Institute, uncovered hundreds of properties, including vacant lots and nonexistent addresses, where six or more people claim to live.
“It’s apparent that King Street Patriots discovered voter fraud in Harris County, though we don’t know just how extensive it is,” said Kelly Shackelford, president/CEO for Liberty Institute and a constitutional scholar. “King Street Patriots is double-checking all registrations leading up to the election, and will be releasing information each week on what they’ve uncovered. There are those who are trying to intimidate King Street Patriots by attempting to vandalize their office and vehicles and monitoring the location of their offices and work. It is unfortunate that our clients are now the focus of intimidation tactics. No one should be intimidated or punished for being a good citizen.”
King Street Patriots released statements today following Harris County‘s news conference announcing their discovery of what they called “voted fraud.” The group, which works to ensure fair and free elections, found evidence suggesting that deputy voter registrars completed registration forms incorrectly, even registering some people without their permission who have not signed up to vote in the past ten years.
“If our elections are not fair, we are not truly free,” said Catherine Engelbrecht, president of King Street Patriots. “Our True the Vote volunteers are working night and day to ensure that elections in Harris County are accurate and that no one’s vote is stolen.”
Acorn worker convicted of voter fraud
“Maria Miles, 37, of Milwaukee, admitted to submitting multiple voter registration applications for some people and to scheming with other Association of Community Organization for Reform workers to sign people up several times in an effort to meet the organization’s voter registration quotas. Miles faces up to 3 ½ years in prison at her sentencing before Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Richard Sankovitz on Oct. 15.”
ACLU lawyer on Georgia citizenship retreat by DOJ
Laughlin McDonald of the ACLU confirms what we posted was the real story behind the DOJ retreat on the Georgia citizenship verification: fear that the U.S. District Court would rule Section 5 unconstitutional and that filing a submission in court is the better way for jurisdictions to obtain preclearance for controversial submissions. Simply, bypass DOJ and allege Section 5 is unconstitutional in your court filing. From the Atlanta Journal Constitution:
But McDonald said it could be that the Justice Department decided to preclear the Georgia program to avoid a worse fate in court. The state’s lawsuit said if the court found its system allowable under the Voting Rights Act, that it should also rule all of Section 5 unconstitutional. The Obama administration probably didn’t want to take the chance of that happening, he said.
“That obviously was something that drove the decision,” McDonald said. “The Department of Justice and others were concerned what this [Supreme Court] would do if it was given an opportunity to rehear a case like this.”